Thursday, May 04, 2006
Psy-Ops Modus Operandi
347 comments - Click for Blog
Having seen and read a great deal about the techniques of Psy-Ops, I advise people on the Internet and in FSHOD to guard against the following:
1. Spin. The spin doctor and has an uncanny ability to spin statements so that they either favour him or present him in a good light or as being right. They accomplish that by using very ambiguous statements with open interpretations and lots of emotion. They often believe their own lies, deceit, and delusions, thereby enhancing their effectiveness. Think David Koresh of the Branch Davidians in Waco, TX, or Jim Jones & the Peoples Temple in Jonestown, Guyana.
2. Attacks against the questioner/messenger. Statements like: "obviously you do not understand" and other belittling barbs. It is an attempt to abusively discredit the challenger. This is the equivalent to psyching-out your opponent in a boxing match.
3. Ambiguity. Nothing can be pinned down, use of broad generalizations and innuendo.
4. Fleeting thoughts. Persons writes numerous, confusing, sometimes disjointed and contradictory statements. Writes to the point of overkill.
5. Rapid-fire propaganda. Floods the audience with thought statements in rapid succession thereby overwhelming the audience until they shutdown and succumb. The statements come fast and furious. Think hyper-activity or trying to push the sell in
as short time as possible.
We've all seen this type of material. The only way to combat Psy-ops is to question the content, timing and source of suspect material. The following are some samples of what the US government has advocated for many years, describing psy-ops using all forms of media. I recommend you spend some time examining this and building a fortress of knowledge around yourself. Knowledge IS power!
http://www.psywarrior.com/links.html
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm33-1/
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm33-1/fm33-1m.htm
http://www.kimsoft.com/guerilla.htm
posted by Anonymous at 5/04/2006 11:46:00 PM
347 Comments:
Hhmm...
What could have inspired that ?
Full-blown psy-ops going on now in Singapore. Voting at the General Elections are on tomorrow (Saturday).
Innuendo, character-assasination, messenger-attacks, you name it. The present Government (in power since 1959) is throwing it at the opposition parties and at people using the state-controlled media (which is everything you see and hear). Many of the opposition candidates are facing lawsuits after the elections. And the sheeple buy the media crap being thrown at them.
For the first time in about 18 years, I get to vote tomorrow. I (and my wife) will be voting for DISCLOSURE. Like where the hell is the national reserves, really! and why are politicians all sitting on interlocking Boards of directors?? To ask such a question to a Minister would invite a swift lawsuit. It's time the sheeple woke up (at least some are opening an eye now). Talk about boxing with glaciers.
Psy-ops. WTF, in Singapore its called Responsible, Nation-Building Media. North Korea with Malls :P
sword said:
Call me anything you want, just not late for the last part of the article "Moon with a view"...
------------------
Come on, sword. What's this bread crumb about Part 7? Bohemia already said earlier that the Iapetus data (including his research) is locked away at NASA.
Unless, you have a spare key,....or know a trap-door somewhere....
Come on, SwArd
Come on already - you just brushed off that mail suggestion.
POST - BACK IT UP
Are they omitting or preaching mystery, containing the facts by blaming the pawns, are they deceiving readers by leading them down blind paths or leaving readers feeling fearful and hopeless?
What are you saying ? Blame ze Chermans when it's really unknown Jordanians ??
We are some sort of "experiment" to Sward.
Stop messing with our heads, I don't see the point of your Trail of Popcorn.
SWORD, where is the blog-link on your profile?
Sward's stock is declining rapidly, why not come clean and 'fess up to being a run-of-the-mill Goof ??
Something right up crypto's alley of hidden histories:
http://www.infowars.net/multimedia/video/trailers/americas_beginnings_mdm.wmv
(Hear Dubya admit that the NWO is the fulfilment of ancient plans)
Peak Oil a Hoax.
"Both the scientists and geologists from the big oil companies have seen the evidence and admitted that the Eugene Island oil field is refilling itself."
http://www.infowars.com/articles/economy/peak_oil_index.htm
OB 2 stopped posting shortly after I received this email which is a copy of an email he received from RCH (I guess?) Through TEM and Drydock, OB2 provided some awesome alien info that is now almost mainstream to FSHOD but at the time, was "huge"..
Thanks for the comm-300 info ;)
OB2 said...
Hi Richard, i been watching the video documentary "The alternative three", i
just wanted to know your opinion about the information in there (i hope you
know about it), specially about the supposed 1962 man landing on Mars.
Great blog, keed the independant minds lightning.
9/9/05 12:33 PM
Richard C. Hoagland said...
Yes, I'm quite familiar with it.
I used to think it was all nonsense. Then, certain pieces began to fit what
was occurring ... and after some research, now I think it may have been a
deliberate effort to "foreshadow" what is coming, but in a way which "flew
it under the social radar" for most folks ....
ONLY if you REALLY begin to ask questions ... DEEP questions ... will you
"put the pieces together" and begin finding your OWN answers.
I think it's primary purpose was to do just that: to get people to begin
asking serious questions ... when the time came ....
Is the film a documentary?
No. We did NOT land "men on Mars" in 1962 (for a variety of reasons too
complicated to go into here).
Mixing "disinfo" together with REAL information is a standard technique for
keeping the real information circumscribed within
a limited community ... and rejected by everybody else.
So, keep asking questions .... :)
Years ago, I casually dismissed "Alternative 3" as just "a bad sci-fi
attempt."
But after all we have discovered over the past 25 or so years, re the ruins
on the Moon, those on Mars ... the HD Physics -- and the demonstrable
environmental effects of this changing Physics on the entire solar system,
including Earth -- I've changed my mind ....
"Alternative 3" seems to have been written (and then videotaped) as a
"cautionary tale" -- re what "could be coming" ... from the perspective of
the 1970's ... by someone on the "inside?"
At least, that's my current thought.
Aspects of it were obviously DELIBERATE disinformation -- like "a manned
Mars landing in 1962" -- which, if it HAD happened, would have effectively
prevented ANY of the revealing unmanned Viking images of Cydonia and the
"Face" and "City" from being released. This "disinfo" was designed, it
seems, to keep the ideas from 'going mainstream; the intended audience would
seem to be ONLY those who can "put the dots together" as events emerge,
confirming the magnitude of the coming environmental changes which could
overtake the Earth.
Those aspects seem to have been an eerie foreshadowing of the precise images
we're seeing on our TV screens ... even NOW.
Bottom line: "someone" seemed to know things about the "changing global
environment" decades ago, which are ONLY revealing themselves now. The main
question then becomes: in terms of the three "scenarios" for "saving" a
portion of Humanity in "Alternative 3," what ELSE did the writer(s) REALLY
know ...?
10
other side of the pacific said...
Peak Oil a Hoax
I don't think so. The oil is definitely fossil in its nature. The pressure pushing oil out of the ground is the problem as there is lots of oil around when you consider that possibly a billion years of vegetative matter has been folded into layers.
Shell has been testing a steam heating technique in Colorado shales which may contain 2 Trillion barrels. The solution of course will come from HAARP when they figure out how to heat old wells and shales and tarsands with EM and push the oil up.
Allrighty then
The solution of course will come from HAARP when they figure out how to heat old wells and shales and tarsands with EM and push the oil up.
----------------------
Eric, you're on to something ;)
Imagine a machine with no mass ;) would you like fries with that?
heck, they might even be able to do it 'on order' : you want kerosene, jet fuel or just plain car fuel? here, let me adjust the dials and....there you go! ;)
I don't think so. The oil is definitely fossil in its nature.
That's right - only so many dead dino's.
uni,
Inspired? hmm...Election year in the US? (and in Singapore, it seems...sounds like a helluva town, OSOTP!).
Ya know...I'm one of those that believes that the spirit moves in mysterious ways...call it synchronicty, mass consiousness, whatever. But after reading the comments on this blog and recalling the last few days...and especially ericswans timely 'Blast From The Past' email he so wisely saved...well, it just so happened that the Psy-OP info kinda fell in my lap...and, hell I don't know how to say it.. it just FITS that I selected that Blog topic! Fucking amaze myself sometimes. ;)
Was watching THC last night. The topic was WW1 declassified.
Evidently, the British were able to sever the oceanic telegraph cables leading from Germany to the US. So, the British were able to use their own spin to cover up the state of the war in order to influence a naive US into joinging. Of course, there were also the GOP war-hawks operating (they were called the party of war then) to push us into WW1.
Point, same then as now. My jaw was bouncing a bit as I was watching todays actions being reported as something that happened over 80 years ago. Nothing seems to have changed. We are all still that gullible with respect to media spin and behind the scenes manipulations. I was actually aggravated by watching the show.
Very synchronistic to say the least. sk posts a psy-ops blog, THC shows a "mirror" show reflecting the same ops from the past that are relevant today and so on.......
Nothing to see here, move along......
Wayne
Bubba/Sword,
Well, the connection between Herr Oberth and Nooordung nee Potocnik, was the Berlin Institute of Technology and Oberth's book Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen (The Rocket into Interplanetary Space). Apparently, it was that which inspired von Braun.
BU,
Maybe it was ze Chermans who inspired the Jordanians?
Crypt0,
Yes, agreed on more study into the relationships of secret societies viz a viz Nazism...there are reams of material out there, a page or two that I have read.
But I think that while von Braun and the other scientists had a profound impact on our scientists, we must not forget the more understated but more significant impact on political and intel operations modus operandi derived from the Allied 'marriage' with Herr Rienhard Gehlen und der Gehlen Org. Bill Donovan (OSS fame) and Allen Dulles (CIA Director '53-'61 and member of the Warren Commission(hmmmm...!)). were instrumental in pulling Gehlen into the fold, and it was from Gehlen that our intelligence service 'infant' gained knowledge, grew legs and stood on its own feet. But those feet were no longer shod in good Amurrican-made work boot...but the jackboot of the SS! (how ya like THAT imagery? LOL!) And over the years that influence spread to the military and law enforcement at all levels. And the fascism and genocide will continue, but under a different banner.
Unless we take it back!
Yo Wayne...I was posting the blog as I watched that, too! That was a pretty good program...like watching a Back To The Future experience.
Oh yeah, cutting the cables is old hat...y'all need to read more! If you want a good non-fiction that reads like fiction pick up A Man Called Intrepid. Illuminating! Your public library should also have a copy of that, and The Puzzle Palace for more info about the NSA.
That's whats killing me about the current furor, at least on talk radio, about James Risen and his exposure of the NSA Domestic Spying. They're saying that he let 'the enemy' have important national security info in 'a time of war'. BS! Hell, if you've read the two books above or just about any Tom Clancy novel, you have a pretty good idea about SIGINT and satellite schedules and all that. No self-respecting terrorist organization would think, or operate, otherwise.
The first thing I learned when I became a regular partaker of Sir Bob's was "Never say anthing over the phone that you wouldn't say in front of the judge". :)
I am reminded of the open mike whisper of the Minister of Environment Watt when he said something to the effect that we don't have to worry about the environment the planet is doomed.
A close examination of the 2004 election with plebicites on abortion and same sex marriage (religious right issues) will reveal the actual neocon base at 22% when you discount the non-voting disgusted American, the bogus computer generated numbers and the fact that there hasn't been an option between GOP and the donkey party for decades.
Hardly a concensus and that's why I still support the U.S. The people are honorable but they are trapped inside the matrix and leaders with integrity are not to be found as they lay dead or disappeared by virtue of the corruption foisted on them when they left the land behind to make money. We all have to look that demon in the maw and make changes. Figure it out. Bubba says barter is the underground economy. I don't think so. If I pick a bush..el of apples for you and you give me a bush..el of apples for me, what is the law on sweat equity?
Write your own history. Everyone else does.
http://www.cathnews.com/news/604/109.php
Ratzinger is following in the footsteps of 500 years of the inquistion which changed its name to...
prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Ratzinger
na_zd,
Guy on Bill Bennet radio talk show today was crying about how unfair it was and that Rummy, Condi, et al. should have a list of 'bullets' available to them so they could 'shoot down' the taunts of these protesters...and I'm thinking "Don't we, the taxpayer, spend about $50,000/day to produce and print and present a daily intelligence briefing for Rummy, Condi, et al.?".
The 'Stumbling Mumbler' is one of Rummy's tried and true methods of deflecting questions...am sure you've seen videoclips of his spending hours in press briefings essentially saying nothing while appearing to. Wears the reporters down, they get tired or other reporters get mad and want to move on to other topics...and Rummy escapes again.
sunking said: we must not forget the more understated but more significant impact on political and intel operations modus operandi derived from the Allied 'marriage' with Herr Rienhard Gehlen und der Gehlen Org. Bill Donovan (OSS fame) and Allen Dulles (CIA Director '53-'61 and member of the Warren Commission(hmmmm...!)). were instrumental in pulling Gehlen into the fold, and it was from Gehlen that our intelligence service 'infant' gained knowledge.....
starshipconstellation says: Bingo! Dave Emory has been talking about that for years. You can find searchable archived radio broadcasts on FSHOD's Dave Emory radio link.
1.0 The BANK OF AMERICA & LOCKHEED-MARTIN AVIATION INDUSTRY
(U.S. Defense Contractor) are owned by the JESUIT ORDER - Those
men in black are the real owner. An info according to the Protestant
member of the Knights Of Malta no other than Mr. Avro Manhattan
and from Bro. Eric Jon Phelps - "Maniacal World Control Thru The
Jesuit Order Well-Hidden Soldiers Of Satan".
are the real owners.
2.0 MONDEX INTERNATIONAL is operated by the Freemasonry under the
umbrella of the Illuminati controlled by the Jesuit Order. The facial
picture of a man with one eye by MONDEX is basically Freemasonic
Symbol known as "All Seeing Eye Of Horus" Egyptian God no other
than Satan himself. The hand shaking is basically masonic brothers
greeting.
are Masonic-Illuminati controlled Mondex International.
One Eye always shown in every movies made by the Opus Dei member no
other than Holliwood actor Mr. Mel Gibson.
3.0 The company which is in firm control of this technology is called
MONDEX, 51% of which is owned by Mastercard. There are at least 20
shareholders having a slice of the other 49% -- all banks, except AT&T.
Fully ten shareholders are banks in Australia. You will hear of MONDEX
oten in the future, as it is well on its way to being the leading provider
globally of this monetary system. Below are the statements made by
MONDEX dated May 22, 1997 :
With the addition of Bank Of Montreal, Canada Trust, Le Mouvement
des caisses Desjardins, National Bank Of Canada, and TD Bank to
MONDEX Canada's existing participants -- CIBC, Royal Bank, Credit
Union Central of Canada and Hong Kong Bank Of Canada -- MONDEX
will represent 90% of the deposit-taking financial institution market in
Canada, at this time. Bell Canada is a marketing participant in the
MONDEX implementation in Ontario.
MONDEX is a payment smart card which brings together the
advantages of paying by cash with the convenience of paying card.
4.0 Mr. Michael Keegan is the C.E.O. of the MONDEX INTERNATIONAL LTD.
5.0 The International Banking Systems being operated by the 13-Families
of the Satanic Illuminati Bloodlines under the umbrealla of the Illuminati
controlled by the Jesuit Order.
13-Families Satanic Illuminati Bloodlines are - Astor, Bundy, Collins, Du
Ponts, Freeman, Kennedy, Li, Onassis, Reynolds, Rockefeller, Rothschild,
Russel & Van Duyn.
Plus, Merovingian, Krupp, Disney & the McDonald.
The Mondex is a mere part of Globalization under the NOUVEL ORDRE MONDIAL or the NEW WORLD ORDER. Overall under the control of the Jesuit Superior General Count Peter Hans Kolvenbach.
prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Ratzinger
------------------
i knew that a long time ago, but its good for the rest to have this.
He 'silenced' a few Thinking Bishops, one of whom was the orginator of "Liberation Theology". That helped kill (both of morale and the body) many people including clergy who rose against the tyranny in South America.
Like crypto said: "render unto Caesar" is State-sponsored religion.
Rummy didn't exactly escape a former CIA analyst who confronted him directly about WMDs yesterday. And Rummy lied,lied,lied as well as sounding a bit flustered. I was listening to C2C and unfortunately my station uses Fox News for its snippets. They also had this, and amazingly also played Rummy saying "we know where the weapons of mass destruction are".
Since we're talking about psy-ops, what value is there for the TPTB to let their lapdog Fox News show Rumsfeld lying? Someone may eventually pull the "decider's" strings hard enough to get him to get rid of Rumsfeld and he is being set up to be a sacrifical goat.
However, I don't believe when the day is over Rumsfeld is particularly worried about anything.
Speaking of C2C, last night I was listening to the rebroadcast of the Wednesday Open Lines for people who wanted to "rant". Most of it was fairly tame until George got some guy from Denver who went after him and RCH for promoting the works of the devil and rewriting the bible. It was hilarious. This guy really had it in for RCH especially, yet admitted to listening to C2C for over ten years.
Did everyone get a chance to read the article by James Carroll that Eric was kind enough to post on the last blog?
That kinda says it all.
Rummy thinks himself a General and the militay considers him one too: General pain in the ass.
"some guy from Denver who went after him and RCH for promoting the works of the devil and rewriting the bible"
ROFLMAO!!!!
Eric pasted:
"13-Families Satanic Illuminati Bloodlines are - Astor, Bundy, Collins, Du Ponts, Freeman, Kennedy, Li, Onassis, Reynolds, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Russel & Van Duyn."
Ya know, Eric...I can buy the bloodlines bidness, keeping the loot and power in da fam and all dat jazz...but the 'Satanic Illuminati" stuff makes my credibility meter swing way to the red. Where you getting that stuff from, bro?
V,
Your description make that place sound so effin' cool!
na z:
LOL. some people do drugs...I buy books. At least I don't have a hangover and I can remember the night before!
With all due appologies though...I was a bookseller in my past life.
You can take the girl outta the bookstore....
na zd,
Support yer local public library! I'ze a firm believer that if my tax dollar bought it, I ain't gonna buy it again!
You can take the girl outta the bookstore.... and then get her good and stoned!
HEY! I resemble that remark!
;)
From House of War by James Carroll
Pg. 63
"Hiroshima is locked in the shadows of repressed memory because a reconsideration of the use of a nuclear weapon would require a reconsideration of Pentagon-centered American power that still depends on nuclear wepons and the lively possibility of a next use."
Do I hear an AMEN??!!
And this is but one quote...i wish i could quote the whole book.
Pardon My Peckerhead Moment.....
Ed Naha: 'Stephen Colbert: The mouth that roared'
Posted on Friday, May 05 @ 09:59:19 EDT
This article has been read 1346 times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed Naha
"Satire is moral outrage transformed into comic art" Philip Roth once declared. He should have added: it's on the wane.
It's been almost a week since Stephen Colbert headlined at The Washington Steno Pool's annual dinner, zeroing in on both Bush and the Steno Pool itself. And, the results are finally dribbling in. Depending on the amount of Kool-Aid in your system, Colbert was "ballsy," or "crude," or "strident," or "dull" or "brave" or "embarrassing" or "heroic" or "cringe-inducing" or "sarcastic" or someone who "needed editing."
Okay. Let me be the first to say it.
He was fucking funny as Hell. When I first saw Colbert's routine, taping it for my wife, I literally fell over laughing. When I showed it to my wife, later, she gasped over some of the jokes and, then, laughed out loud, raucously.
This was fearless, funny political satire. Bush, in Joe McCarthy terms, was hilariously called out by Shecky R. Murrow; not only in front of the alleged media but in front of the world.
But a comedian is only as good as his straight-man. And, watching Bush react, (lips pursed in "sucking lemon" mode, face eventually getting so mottled as to resemble the Doppler radar map announcing the arrival of Hurricane Katrina) made Colbert's routine a true case of "Mission Accomplished."
Colbert stunned both the President and his lackeys (some actually fled) as well as the MSM toadies in attendance. That is what political satirists are supposed to do. And political satire is a lost art, these days, in America. There are maybe three practitioners left. But Colbert is special because he launches his barbs in character, the character being a Right Wingnut. He's the President's biggest fan and, in defending him, unintentionally disses him. This is nothing short of genius.
I can't remember any satirist, but for Will Rogers, who offered political commentary couched in character. And, hey, for all I know, Will really did offer zingers, off-stage, while dressed in a cowboy suit and twirling a lariat. But the fine art of socio-political humor has been whittled down, of late. There are no Twains, Bierces, Menckens, Parkers, Bruces, Sahls or Belzers, anymore. Most mainstream folks, these days, find Jay Leno cutting edge.
In other words, if you hire a comedian for one of these gatherings, you expect the set-up and the limp punchline. Another set-up. Another limp punchline. That passes for humor. On TV, Leno zeroes in on Bush's stupidity before dredging up more old Clinton jokes. Letterman goes for the throat before, alas, also dredging up more old Clinton jokes.
But for Jon Stewart and, sometimes, Bill Maher, Colbert is the only one out there willing to dance on the razor's edge.
Today? Truthiness is considered awkward. (Note: the dwindling amount of editorial cartoons in American newspapers. We don't want to think before we laugh. We just want to laugh. Re-write? Get me Marmaduke!)
The Colbert routine was important for two reasons. First, he managed to look the President in his eye as he belittled just about every cause the President has foisted upon a post 9/11 dazed populace. Two, he brought up every failure, in twenty minutes, the President and his toady press corpse has allowed to happen since 9/11.
And, oh yeah, it was funny as Hell.
Here's Colbert on the illegal Bush wire-tapping: "By the way, before I get started, if anybody needs anything at their tables, speak slowly and clearly on into your table numbers and somebody from the NSA will be right over with a cocktail."
Here's Colbert on being a Bush American: "I believe in pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps. I believe it is possible -- I saw this guy do it once in Cirque du Soleil. It was magical. And though I am a committed Christian, I believe that everyone has the right to their own religion, be it Hindu, Jewish or Muslim. I believe in our infinite paths to accepting Jesus Christ as your personal savior."
Here's Colbert on the press: "What are you thinking, reporting on NSA wiretapping or secret prisons in Eastern Europe? Those things are secret for a very important reason, they're super-depressing. And if that's your goal, well, misery accomplished.
"Over the last five years you people were so good over tax cuts, WMD intelligence, the effect of global warming. We Americans didn't want to know, and you had the courtesy not to try to find out. Those were good times, as far as we knew."
I won't go on quoting, because we've all seen the more outrageous ones.
He, then, concluded with a video presentation that, not only used the press corpse's words against them, but lambasted both Bush giving reporters nicknames like "Stretch" (or Sneezy or Dopey or Doc) and the reporters accepting them, and also lionized Helen Thomas, who was the first reporter knee-capped and tossed aside by BushCo. because she actually asked questions and doesn't give a flying "F" about being crowned "Miss Popularity."
The interesting result of Colbert blasting both Bush and the media is that the media blinked. It covered the Steno Pool's dinner but ignored Colbert for a day or so. Instead, the MSM focused on Bush's routine with a double, the double allegedly saying what Bush was thinking before Bush spoke. It was pure Leno. Set-up. Soft punchlines. The media swooned over it, saying that it showed Bush to be a self-deprecating, regular, goshdarn guy. Again, they drank the Kool-Aid. They bought into Bush's bilge to save their own asses, kicked by Colbert.
Then, the bloggers dove in on the internetz. WTF? The liberal bloggers couldn't fathom why the MSM was ignoring Colbert and concentrating on "funny" Double-Ya's.
Wrote Salon's Peter Daou: "The AP's first stab at it and pieces from Reuters and the Chicago Tribune tell us everything we need to know: Colbert's performance is sidestepped and marginalized while Bush is treated as light-hearted, humble, and funny. Expect nothing less from the cowardly American media. The story could just as well have been Bush and Laura's discomfort and the crowd's semi-hostile reaction to Colbert's razor-sharp barbs. In fact, I would guess that from the perspective of newsworthiness and public interest, Bush-the-playful-president is far less compelling than a comedy sketch gone awry."
Huffington Post's Christopher Durang wrote: "Colbert's was a brave and shocking performance. And for the media to pretend it isn't newsworthy is a total bafflement. And a symbol of how shoddy and suspect the media is."
Soon, the MSM had to face the story. Think of a reply. So, at first, they said that they ignored Colbert because he was "unfunny."
At "The National Review," it was declared that: "The jokes bombed because the truth in comedy is what makes it funny." Note the word: "Bombed." That sums up our recent history, literally.
The Washington Post's Dana Milbank, who dressed in a red Elmer Fudd hunting outfit to report on Cheney blasting a lawyer's face in on "Countdown," declared to Keith Olberman: "He wasn't terribly funny and he had the misfortune of following Bush, who actually did put on one of the better performances of his presidency." (Aside from the performance where he mislead us into a never-ending war?)
On "Hardball," Chris Slatherer asked Time com. political editor Mike Allen: "Why do you think he was so bad?"
Allen replied: "You have to have a sense of the room, and, as you know, the standard at these dinners is singe, not burn. He didn't achieve that."
Tucker Carlson (oh, where's that spinning bow-tie when you so need it) stated Colbert's routine was an "embarrassing public flop."
So, the hoi polloi reached it's verdict. Colbert wasn't funny. But, then, the story shifted. Why didn't the hoi polloi mention Colbert in the first place?
The theory floated by the hoi polloi? Liberals were trying to protect one of their own.
CNN's Lou Dobbs asked conservative columnist Martha Zoller, after showing a clip wherein Colbert declared: "The greatest thing about this man is he's steady. You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday. Events can change, this man's beliefs never will." : "Do you think it's a reflection that the liberal still has -- the media has a liberal bias, Martha, that Colbert was not more heavily criticized, say, than Imus years ago with Bill Clinton?"
Zoller: "Well, certainly there is a liberal bias, and he is picking on George Bush, who the media doesn't like, versus Imus, who was picking on Clinton, who the media loved, OK? And so, you really see a little bit of a bias. What came to mind after seeing flight -- United 93 this weekend is 9-11 was a Tuesday, so that was -- and he probably didn't even think about that, but for me, having lost friends in the World Trade Towers, that was the first thing I thought of."
(NOTE: The above response is the Webster's Dictionary definition of "totally batshit.")
The New York Times waited four days before (not) weighing in but, at least, mentioned the name "Colbert," before reporting on the internet debate and not quoting any of Colbert's fans, just a blog dissing him.
The Washington Post's Richard Cohen, who never objected to Bush's really funny "whar's those WMD's?" slide-show at the Steno Pool's dinner two years ago, or last year's Pickles Bush "my man masturbates an animal" riff, declared, in his column: "I am a funny guy. This is well known in certain circles, which is why, even back in elementary school, I was sometimes asked by the teacher to 'say something funny' -- as if the deed could be done on demand. This, anyway, is my standing for stating that Stephen Colbert was not funny at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner...
"The commentary, though, is also what I do, and it will make the point that Colbert was not just a failure as a comedian but rude."
Richard? I know funny guys. I am a funny guy. Funny? You ain't. (Unless you're one of those Uncle Vinny, who eats too much pasta and drinks too much at a family dinner and, then, cracks himself up farting and burping "God Bless, America" before bursting into tears and reciting "The Pledge of Allegiance" types who are thought funny.) And, by the by, in elementary school? "The Yellow River" by I.P. Daily is considered funny. Get a life.
Meanwhile, after the speech, on "The Daily Show," on Monday, Jon Stewart declared. "It was balls-alicious. Apparently he (Colbert) was under the impression that they'd hired him to do what he does every night on television"-that is, make fun of conservatives, public officials and the press in the guise of an O'Reillyesque talk show host.
"We've never been prouder of him, but HOLY SHIT," Stewart added.
He also described the annual dinner as "where the President and the press corps consummate their loveless marriage."
Later, on his own show, Colbert raved about "the honor of appearing" at the Steno-Pool fest, filled with "power players" wherein he "fit right in."
Colbert enthused: "Best of all, I got to meet my main man, President Bush."
Colbert then played the stunned reaction of the audience, with the sound of crickets chirping above their flaccid faces, describing it all as "very respectful silence."
Stating that the crowd loved him, he enthused: "They practically carried me out on their shoulders...even though I wasn't ready to go."
On the following night, Colbert showed an edited version of his audition tape as Press Secretary riff, with Helen Thomas pursuing him. He grinned at his audience, as if proud.
Again, Colbert never breaks character. He never winks at the audience. He assumes his audience is smart.
Which is why he, really, wasn't speaking to the Steno-Pool, last week. He was speaking beyond them. To the smart ones. To all of us who realize that humor CAN make a change. Laugh at the Emperor who wears no clothes and, soon, all will see that he's in the buff. Swat down the angry, saber-rattling speech with a guffaw, and the saber is whittled down to a tooth-pick.
It's just one tact in fighting an arrogant would-be warrior. It's one that works. How many school bullies have been side-lined by snarkiness? Countless.
A few quotes, here, to sum things up.
"A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar." H. L. Mencken.
"Journalism is the ability to meet the challenge of filling space." Rebecca West.
Most importantly:
"The secret of the demagogue is to make himself as stupid as his audience so that they believe they are as clever as he." Karl Kraus.
It's all about truthiness.
Or as Stephen Colbert said, recently: "It's my privilege tonight to celebrate our president. He's not so different, he and I. We get it. We're not Brainiacs on the nerd patrol. We're not members of the fact police. We go straight from the gut, right sir? That's where the truth lies, right down here in the gut. Do you know you have more nerve endings in your gut than you have in your head? You can look it up. I know some of you are going to say I did look it up, and that's not true. That's but you looked it up in a book.
"Next time look it up in your gut. I did. My gut tells me that's how our nervous system works. Every night on my show, the Colbert report, I speak straight from the gut, ok? I give people the truth, unfiltered by rational argument. I call it the no fact zone."
And, facts are dangerous in a world where satire is considered sacrilege.
Ya gotta laugh about it. In fact, you have to laugh about it.
Yelling doesn't throw Bush off. Derision does.
Source:
http://mkanejeeves.com/?p=201
So, looks like Porter Goss is the first head to roll at the CIA...
maybe we should nick name him Patsy Goss.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/05/D8HDP04G8.html
Hi All,
Great post SunKing. Here's a little psy-ops to ponder, re: BIG OIL.
Suppose that peak oil is indeed a hoax and the cat is outta the bag so to speak. Scarcity of oil will drive up the price only if it can be proved scarce, which it can't be right now. So the next step is a shaky Mid-East. If nobody invades Iran, or they are all bluster and things quiet down the price is going to drop again. From all that I've read, the world is awash in oil. The price just keeps being bid up on the commodity exchange on scarey news. Did anyone notice that from a high of $14, natural gas is back down to $7? Maybe because the electric plants are using coal instead? Oops. Russia has oil reserves they haven't even tapped yet. So the oil companies strangle the supply of gasoline and diesel by limiting refining. The price of oil drops but gasoline can stay high because of short supply. That's one point.
Here's something else to think about. If all the above is true and oil prices stabilize and the gov't mandates more refining via tax credits or some other coersion, one problem still remains.
Global warming. So you can't just go your merry way burning fossil fuel, because it will eventually kill us all supposedly. Is that also a hoax? What is the percentage in limiting using a plentiful fuel? And if it is true and all the regulation of utilities and transportation are needed, why is it one of the biggest users of petroleum fuel, airplanes are not regulated as much? I haven't figured out the connection between global warming and the advantage it gives TPTB, but it's there somewhere. The weather service has only been keeping temperature records since 1905, so where is the info coming from that they can say with certainty that oil causes warming? And here's another question. The cause has gone from pollution caused by fossil fuel to being the over abundance of CO2 in general due to "human activity". That's a new eufamism for living I guess or just too many people. Doesn't it follow that if the population of the planet increases by billions since the 1900's that there would be more CO2? Duh. Is that why the need for population reduction by TPTB? Guess we all have to stop breathing.
Needless to say, if you scrutinize all of this nonsense it starts to smell like the big pile of BS that it is. The one thing these lines of thought all have in common is that there always has to be a crisis that the gov't has to 'save' us from. What would we need them all for otherwise? If those two don't do it there is always the Bird Flu waiting in the wings.
Money and Power the two common demoninators.
mac
PS
There's nothing on my blog but I'm working on some things I have interest in.
Peace
Good points mac!
IMO, gas prices, right now are being used as a red herring to distract the people away from the whole "iran" problem that is probably, quietly, being formulated as we speak. Frankly i think peak oil is being played, convienently right now as a further justification for the companies to make more money and put us, the little guy, further into debt, and become further endtured to our "leaders". The gas prices are completely artifical and most americans are begining to figure that out...they just don't know the WHY its artificial.
If Chavez wasn't considered such a loon, we could snuggle up to him and have 99 cent gas again....but the guy is a "nut" and demonized by the US gov't because he doesn't play well with the Bush Admin.
(I thought his offer after Katrina was a really decent thing to do.) Bush didn't want to deal with the strings attatched though...he WANTED TO MAKE $$$$$$
I don't actually mean this literally, but sometimes I just feel like EVERYTHING is a frikkin hoax. Peak Oil felt that way since day one.
Anybody else know what I'm saying?
Like I said, when I read or hear "the news", I now look first for the scam.
---
Speaking of Chavez, we haven't had a recent update on he and Jimmy Walters starting an international looksee into 9-11.
Last I heard Walters and the Towers maintenance guy Rodriguez arrived in Venezuela somehow, after being put on the no-fly list.
I think it was Heinlien who wrote "The best way to tell a lie is to tell the truth so unconvincingly that it's believed to be a lie"!
But consider, Sword, how after the tremendous psy-ops played on the American people pre-March 2003, wherein an entire NATION 'understood' that the most powerful people in the administration had told us that Iraq had nuclear WMD and that it was an IMMEDIATE threat...yet it could be technically and truthfully proven that none of the scoundrels actually said it!...how can we ever believe anyhing like that again? Does anyone see how we are set up to where, as I've said before, the 2nd Coming of Jesus could occur...yea, even the Rapture.........and no one would believe it, that it could be explained away as an ET invasion?
I know people have talked about and joked about it...but can you not now see who this can be done?
How can you be sure that any picture you see has not been doctored?
How can you be sure that any audio or video recording has not been tampered with?
How can you be sure that the things you are seeing with your own eye's are not the result of holographic presentation or some manipulation of neural/optical nerves?
Hell...gimme GANJA and fuck all! lol!
Good work, V!
Follow the money, baby!!!
OK:
Ambien defense: check
I'm depressed: Check
I'm a Kennedy: check
Going to rehab: check
Status Quo for family: Check
Hey...even Rush Limbaugh was commiserating with P. Kennedy today. The quality of mercy.....
Anybody have an idea for a new poll?
No Sword, I'm not doing THAT one....YET! ;) But then, the day's still young.
Things could be worse scarletm
He's representing my state. He's always got some 'issue', and it's never minor.
unipax, I totally agree with you about looking for the hoax anytime I crack open a newspaper or have the misfortune of being in front a television set. I've felt that peak oil is a hoax for quite sometime.
Since Rumsfeld admitted shooting down the airliner over Pennsylvania on 9/11, I'd have to think that the majority of the events portrayed in the movie currently playing has to also be a hoax. Or worse, it's true and the passengers tried to take the plane only to get shot down instead so the ending is false.
I appreciated ericswan's reposting of what RCH said about Alternative 3 because it points up the problem that plagues anyone searching for the truth. Which is, separating the truth from the embeddded lies. A perfect example is when Dan Rather got sucker punched on that document regarding Bush's alledged military service. I have no doubt that every word on the document was truth, but since those words were placed on a forged replica, the truth is discredited when the lie of paper artifact is exposed.
About public libraries: If you have a good one where you live support the hell out of it. A lot of public libraries are subscribing to a bullshit idea being generated by library schools called "The Business Model of Libraries". The end result of that is libraries cater to the lowest common denominator in the worst way imaginable. One of the side effects of this is the mass discarding of older books and periodicals. You end up losing the viewpoint of what our predecessors actually thought on a given topic and if it's replaced at all, you end up with a suspicious revisionist version of something that is poorly written and shallow.
Library schools are also cranking out "librarians" who are shockingly not well read people who don't a clue about literature, history, science etc. These people often end up in charge of deciding what to discard. They also base it solely on circulation statistics, even when there is plenty of room on the shelves to keep something. Classics on all topics get tossed. If you're lucky an older librarian will catch these things and get them back on the shelf, but the majority of the time wonderful books end up in the booksale instead of remaining on the shelf that you paid for. I've rescued a few books from the booksale and they are now safe in my home because anything that doesn't sell at the end, gets shredded.
Libraries used to be one of my favourite places, but now they mostly just break my heart. Because I don't sell enough paintings to quit my day job, my day job is in a public library that has lost its mind and its soul.
So I repeat: If you have a good public library where you live, support it! Especially on the subjects that matter most to FSHOD!
That was an interesting treatise above, Mac...very good points, making the brain work!
Thanks SK
Mac....
Like i said yesterday...and they let this guy VOTE?
Look, phenegran will knock your ass out...on top of Ambien I can't believe he's alive!(and didn't kill someone!)
Its this whiny, Oh, i have a problem..I'll go to The fREAKING MAYO CLINIC and I'll be ALL better.
he has a habit of crashing his car, boats, hell, even into people and he's not responsible enough to stop back THEN! Hand is caught in the cookie jar Its all tearful appologies....i'm SO sick of these idiots, Rush Limbaugh included, pleading for mercy because they got addicted to drugs.
DUH! Its fucking lfe 101...DRUGS ARE BAD FOR YOU. If you choose to do them in irresponsible quantities
bad things will PROBABLY happen to you.
Now, if they guy has legit depression, i feel sorry for him...but he and his DOCTOR know that he shouldn't be using sleep meds for chronicaly depressed people!
Personal accountability and RESPONSIBILITY.
Where the hell is it anymore????
Brings to mind the bumpersticker:
I'd rather go hunting with Dick Cheney than take a ride with a Kennedy
LMAO
Starship,
Dang...that's a sad state of affairs. le Bummere!
Scarlet,
yes, I find it stinks that the Capitol Hill fuzzery didn't even give the field sobriety test. They would have clubbed Jas and carted him off to the Bastille, forthwith!
V,
Dang! Where have I been? Goss Gone? GOOOOOOD! SEE YA, LOSER!
But what new rotten asshole will they appoint? hmmmmmmmmmm...
sunking said;
The 'Stumbling Mumbler' is one of Rummy's tried and true methods of deflecting questions...am sure you've seen videoclips of his spending hours in press briefings essentially saying nothing while appearing to. Wears the reporters down, they get tired or other reporters get mad and want to move on to other topics...and Rummy escapes again.
Friday, May 05, 2006 10:13:36 AM
Ya, saw that act last night on AC 360. What a puppet! If i did that shit in my job, I'd never work again. It's all bogus, heinous and downright unbelieveable how they can keep working like that and their employer (US) keep letting them get away with it!
starship said;
"Since Rumsfeld admitted shooting down the airliner over Pennsylvania on 9/11,"
Wow, I didn't know he said that! When did that happen? How did I miss it?
??????????????
scarletm said;
Personal accountability and RESPONSIBILITY.
Where the hell is it anymore????
Friday, May 05, 2006 4:27:09 PM
That behavior is ONLY for the sheeple. Step outta line and WHAM! you are in the hoosgow for life!
Amen to that bubba! (re;diggin up the dirt on shrub)
Wayne
Re:Kennedy et.al...
A while back in an earlier post I suggested 2 terms and out for all these morons. The career politicians are not what the founders had in mind when they set up a citizen legislature. They forsaw a couple of terms of PUBLIC SERVICE. Not PERSONAL GAIN. Now they serve thier terms and if they get beat, they are back at the public trough as a lobbyist. Kind of like the Night of the Walking Dead. You just can't get rid of them. Now we have dynasties like the Kennedys who just go on and on and think it's thier right to be in power. This isn't Britain, and the Senate isn't the House of Lords. They all need to go home and get a job. The country isn't run by them anyway. It's mostly run by the everyday gov't employees. The politicians just seem to f**k it all up anyway.
And by the way where does Cheney (Mr. Secret) get off scolding Putin about human rights. Can you say Gitmo? WTF. Shut Up! When are the arrogant a**holes going to mind their own business and just clean up the mess here at home. WTF indeed!!!
mac,
you dont have to restrain yerself here, so just go ahead and say what you really think.
; P
{word verification: kqllmksxcgijwsubvzjranrhjlzasuxvrljqtuxnja}
From all that I've read, the world is awash in oil.
The Financial Press wants you to buy Stocks WHEN YOU SHOULD BE BUYING COMMODITIES LIKE OIL AND GOLD !!
Get some Geologists and look for Oil.
Go ahead and lose your money.
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:27:07 -0600
Tony,
We are just beginning again to rebuild another MEG demonstrator, for testing and then funding to complete the program.
We have a very hard year to a year and a half of work on the MEG, before it is out of engineering development and ready for production engineering. At that time, with successful conclusion of ED we will hopefully be in condition to place the system on the market.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
(I would like to believe !!)
Unipax said...
{word verification: kqllmksxcgijwsubvzjranrhjlzasuxvrljqtuxnja}
ROFL. i have had a few of those myself today.
Stuart,
What form of "free" energy device are you investigating?
Stuart,
Here's my favorite overview of 'free' energy:
http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/feb2/lindemnn.htm
I'm not in it for theory.
Fooling with Legtricity without any theory knowledge is DANGEROUS !!
Get an Electrician to look at it. Be Safe !!
Stuart,
well maybe Bearden's site would help you.
Anyway, that link is good for general ref, it mentions vacuum too, but more improtantly it gives a great perspective on the human side of the issue
BU
You didn't put your tongue in the wall socket again, did you?
just kidding, no offense
;)
Careful, Stuart
; P
Stuart, one of us, I think Bryansail is working on Ed Gray's FE motor.
You might wanna talk to him
We are just beginning again to rebuild another MEG demonstrator, for testing and then funding to complete the program.
We have a very hard year to a year and a half of work on the MEG, before it is out of engineering development and ready for production engineering. At that time, with successful conclusion of ED we will hopefully be in condition to place the system on the market.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
<
dangerous talk
I thought Tom B knew that we're allowed to build and play with them, but not allowed to market them.
Bio Unit: I have a hell of a lot of knowledge of Electricity and its associated circuits
You're not in it for the theory, then you say you're an EE.
http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/feb2/lindemnn.htm
Vol 2 Feb 2002
Old News that the EE's had for years. Why don't you bring this to your EE friends (since they are so very much above the rest of us, it must be their grounding in THEORY)
Stu, who cares, you don't want to alienate your EE friends by posting here with us "crazies"
Stu is a Snob
Sward is a Snob
Fake Rebel Blog has no traffic because Sunking IS NOT A REBEL
SUNKING = TPTB
BU.. some of US read the blog, chase the links, think a thought and post. We're here. Waiting for you to lose it.. There......ahhhh..that feels ........greaaat.....
Thanks...I needed that...
Now what I really need...really really need..is for you.. BU to see magnetism for what it really is....it's love.. in all of its dimensions...
BU to see magnetism for what it really is....it's love.. in all of its dimensions...
FAGNETISM, the urge to overlook Crimes Against Americans or Iraqi's because ? Just because ?
HijackthatUFO.net
I'm waiting for Sunking to expand on his Blog entry.
We know what he really meant.
The Zionists are the New Goebbels and everyone must bow down before them, much like Ericswan did in his falling all over trying to please the Rabbi's and their silly "deprived" religion in his Blog.
Cydonia Minerological Map
http://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/i2811/
The Cydonia Mensae Face in the THEMIS IR QUBs for spectrographic analysis is a minimum 50 pixels long by more than 30 pixels wide. For Don, NASA/JPL or ANY OTHER geologist to say there is not enough data to make DETAILED analysis on that Minerological map is simply riduclous spin control and a mis-direction of Phys-ops operations at its best.
To simply explain NOT looking and SPECIFYING which mineralogical spectrums found as simply 'Enigmatic' is a phys-ops cop-out worthy of this Administration saying that EVERYBODY believed Iraq had weapons of Mass Destruction and posed an IMMEDIATE threat to America.
Again, if this is the ONLY minerological map of Cydonia, to NOT put the compositional detail of the Monuments that exist in the Cydonia plain that are IN FACT large enough to SPECIFICALLY DETERMINE what EACH MAJOR MONUMENT is made of is simply dereliction of duty and outright censorship of data by the NASA/JPL/THEMIS/MSSS teams.
So there are at least two people here I know of that MAY have access to a more detailed Cydonia spectrographical map of Cydonia WITH THE MONUMENTS DETAILED ON THEM, I again urge you to find it, copy it, mail it amoung other things such as papers that aren't published because of NASA/JPL or TOP censorship.
P.O. Box 507
Mooers NY 12958
I WILL do MORE with the information.
CHOOSE.
You either get off the bus of sheeple which you know has a bomb of ignorance on it...or remain and be blown to bits like everyone else.
Bob...:(
Check Jim McCanney's take on the fragmented coment - disinfo he says
http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/
tacodog said...
Check Jim McCanney's take on the fragmented coment - disinfo he says
http://www.jmccanneyscience.com
A good read and timing to boot eh Sunking?
You're right about something smells cheesy in Denmark with the May 25 snowball from hell. One has to wonder why Julien refers to comets as "watery" when V and others will confirm that that is most unlikely. I don't mind getting sucked in every once in a while. McCanney makes his point that 73P is mostly about disinfoing the electric universe. Bu where are you?
had braved the Soviet Union's fierce hostility to Judaism
That nonsense was posted on YOUR BLOG, Eric !!
95 PER CENT of the COMMUNIST LEADERS were JEWISH, NOT RUSSIAN JEWS NEW YORK JEWS !!
I am here where I am, you are in someone's pocket.
The tribes were scattered. What more do you want?
BU.
What's your point please?
Just continue lying
say
Anybody who asks questions that go off the pre-ordained script in any public forum is dragged out by the nearest security goon.
Slap-and-tickle
Like CSIS, SCIS is a creature of Wall Street and the military-industrial complex.
My Website has a new Chart showing the connections amongst different factions in the Labyrinth Group
ACIO
I paid Dues
Never recieved reciepts
VERY Interesting article, sorry about the cold link;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/4977134.stm
Hacker fears 'UFO cover-up'
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW
Gary McKinnon
Watch the interview
In 2002, Gary McKinnon was arrested by the UK's national high-tech crime unit, after being accused of hacking into Nasa and the US military computer networks.
I love the disclaimer at the end. Such BS!
For your perusal crewe.
Wayne
"Neo-Cons, who are profiteers of war, are blocking the Iranians from a diplomatic solution they were desperate to find."
Crypto:
This is nothing new, you are right. Since WWII the Us has made it policy to shoot first and pick up whats left later. The US was all but too aware that Japan was wanting to go through diplomatic channels, and had been begging for months...but WE had the Bomb, and we weren't gonna be happy till we proved that we had it and were were ready and able to use it.
We did.
Wiped out millions if innocent Japanese women and children...just to prove the point to Russia, we weren't screwing around. The world was on notice.
So, is Iran the next POINT?
To show the world THE NEO CONS ARE FIRMLY IN CONTROL???
God, I hope not.
Some really good posts here yesterday. So much info.
and good to see Robert is still very motivated to begin
the transfer into a new and better age. I'm really hoping that
Robert is not "ahead of his time"
The question of energy is an interesting one, if nuclear
detonations can cause far reaching effects to dimension(s)
near and invisible to you, perhaps pulling energy from
the "aether" (there is no one term for it that is currently
agreed upon it appears ) also is a problem. I have asked
the neighboring dimensions for guidance, but still haven't
been able to tune their reply in.
I am reading the other topics here (Iran) and I can't comment
because they are super depressing (Colbert) ;)
We need more Colberts- A LOT MORE.
Bryan
The plans I am following are Gary Magrattan's interpretation
of Edwin Gray's circuit patent. The circuit he lays out is not
difficult to follow, some of the relationships in that
circuit are unusual and require an odd collection of parts.
My partner keeps mentioning work arounds and substitution
parts, but we now agree on following Magrattan's diagrams/
instructions preciscly in order to test Magrattan's claim
that the circuit will do what he says it will. This is just
one plan though, there are other ones which may have more
flexibility for applications and scaling and less unknowns
regarding ionization effects and electro magnetic radiation.
Unipax's link to spirit of Maat site / Peter Lindemanns site
remain the best broad scope look at the subject that I've
seen on the internet. Magrattan reaps praise on Lindemann saying that his
work would not have occurred w/ out Lindemanns investigations.
Currently the status on our circuit is that we have the
c-set and it's plexiglass housing complete. The c-set is where
the spark occurs. We have some
of the parts (diodes, copper, etc.) and still need others.
The capacitors are going to have to be purchased (waiting
for money to fall out of the sky) but some of the other parts
can be built and found.
Thanks for the Mcanney link Tacodog, I was wondering what
his take on some of our current topics was. I'm also still
wondering where Tesla information goes-Mcanney's Tesla
tower is STILL not updated. I think some of this info.
is continually being funneled into the aether. Experimenters
are also being funneled into the aether, the further they
go, the less they publish (and the more they perish lol)
The images from yesterday that Bohemia linked are amazing.
The clouds look like they are charged electrically, (think plasma)
In the dune field image, some pyramid looking objects similiar to the
Cydonia region. I used to live in the one near the upper
left with the neat 45 degree angle and a T shape, the view was gorgeous
untill the planet shrapnel debacle happened.
Off to find wind or break wind, not sure which. Bryan
Logispark, Hello
Two links I wanted to pass your way. May not be useful to your work but they popped up for me when I read your comments.
Bearden's work.
http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Final%20Secret%209%20Feb%201993/indexold.html
The Keely Musical Dynasphere
http://www.svpvril.com/dynasum1.html
SWORD, HI
Yes I know that site because I used it previously with you, in talking about Iraq being about the control of the ET technology there.
This was a good line from that link you gave:
The first opportunity... to observe the twelfth planet as its orbit brings it back..... to Earth’s vicinity, then, was when it aligned with Mercury, at an angle... of 30 degrees... to the imaginary Celestial axis... of Sun-Earth perigee. Coming closer to Earth... and thus, appearing to "rise" farther in Earth’s
skies, (another 30 degrees
to be exact), the planet crossed the orbit of Jupiter.
Finally arriving at the place... where the Celestial battle had taken place, the perigee, or the "place of crossing", the planet is "Nibiru"!
iontruo2-->So now I have to check your example of The Zodiac of Cancer. I am curious if it relates to the constellation of Pegasus as we had discussed earlier.
Will get back to you that.
Sunking:
In light of your post about psy-ops may I offer this:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/coldwar/documents/episode-1/kennan.htm
It is a link to the so called Long Telegram by the "author" of the Cold War George Kennan.
What strikes me about this treatise, that ended up becoming not just policy but absolute doctrine, is its insistence that The American People MUST, by whatever means necessary, be completely in step with it.
Kennan states:
"We must see that our public is educated to realities of Russian situation. I cannot over-emphasize importance of this. Press cannot do this alone. It must be done mainly by Government, which is necessarily more experienced and better informed on practical problems involved. In this we need not be deterred by [ugliness?] of picture. I am convinced that there would be far less hysterical anti-Sovietism in our country today if realities of this situation were better understood by our people. There is nothing as dangerous or as terrifying as the unknown."
I have always been bothered by the nagging question as to why, in the 1950s, society suddenly got so damn "squeaky clean." Well, now I know. IT WAS DESIGNED TO. I always thought that the 50's was simply a pendulum swing like reaction to dropping the bomb...a way to rid the collective consciousness of the American public of the guilt rendered by The Bomb. Not so...it was to create an idillic society as an antidote to Communism. No wonder why Rock and Roll was such a threat...it didn't follow the "party line." It DID, indeed represent the door through which the "ideal" society might wish to leave the party. It WAS a smudge on the pristine image that the psy ops were so desperate to project.
I guess my whole point here is this..what in society today might be construed into "image building," not for us, but for "Them". ( And who is our present "Them" these days?)
I think we have all figured out that the Cold War was never really won so much as just stopped being waged in the pubic arena. Because the Psy ops did such a good job, we will forever look at Russia with a cocked eye. Almost 3 generations later and suspicion is still a lingering reality in most American's minds when thinking about the former USSR! Yes, I know, probably for good reason, but what if there isn't one?
What if there isn't one in Iran and we are being led to believe that Iran is the newest "evil" we must combat or worse pre strike?
Crewe, what do you think is the latest Psy Op being waged on us? And how much of it should we believe?
sword said;
"I bring up the question again - WHAT does America want with THIS area?"
A little help here crew. I think this needs to be answered and I don't have one.
Wayne
Scarletm..great post and good insight. You probably remember making a snowman way back when? Well the psy ops spend their day making boogie men. The religious aspects and language barriers make it easier for one group to "identify" an "outsider?". In the present circumstances, Canadian politicians will "go with the flow" because the powers of deception are more than able to "sway" public opinion and make your neighbour to the north a "villain". It's either play ball or roll the dice. Peak oil may be one of the tools that keeps Canadians and their political parties towing the line. One day in February a poll was conducted which said Canadians opposed being a part of the Middle East conflict. Harper gets elected with less than 34% of those who voted and less than 60% voted but suddenly the polls say 54% of Canadians are in favour of being in Afghanistan.
Harper signed onto the as yet undisclosed NORAD agreement with the U.S. less than a week back. Since then, the Chemtrailers are out brazenly placing X's in the skies here in Kamloops when they would rarely turn their burners on over the city. Then this morning the RCMP did the 360 around my house in a helicopter.
Just a final thought on Julien and his May 25 "day of destiny". McCanney has a point. Why is he and all the other "official observers" calling the chunks of 73P snowballs? More disinformation and the dynamic is there to discredit anyone and everyone who ever thought about aliens, crop circles or the apocolypse.
SWORD,
O.K. thanks, so Pegasus, is the approach, 30 degrees to the celestial axis of Sun-Earth perigree, appearing in the South.
A number of times now you have mentioned confidently that the Annunnaki are long gone. Dead or left? Why might you think that?
Do you feel "Niburu" itself was what broke up complete in the X-Mass story, last time?
Ah, sorry, so many questions just pinging in ones' head, puzzling the pieces together. ;)...and how about the Humpty Dumpty, hmmm.
Well I have to head off to work over night, I've nothing to offer yet on the Iran/Iraq question. Thats a tough one, no insights.
What about THAT area, that America would want? ...other than technology of old, I'm stuck on that one right now. later
Eric,
It seems completely bizarre to me that peak oil would even enter a discussion in Canada. I have stated before (and will believe it till the day I die, or I am proven wrong otherwise) that Alberta has more "fossil" fuel than all of Saudi Arbia, Iran and Iraq combined. And it's hardly been tapped! Now, i understand that the tar sands in Ft McMurray are supposedly difficult to refine...but if its that damn hard, why is it the fastest growing city in Alberta and possibly Canada? We can put a man on the moon, but we can't refine tar sand efficently? Sorry, I have my doubts there. Its absolutely no mistake that Harper is a Calgarian. Perhaps he could be called "Bush lite?" You all think Bush has ties to Big Oil???Canada's Harper could buy and sell him all day long! Now, does Harper have the same Saudi ties that Bush does? I don't know...but they all play ball in the same club now don't they?
I am going to be very interested to see exactly how well Mr Harper plays with this Bush Admin. I have a feeling the term peas and carrots will crop up. (pardon the pun.)
So far as a holder of monies in Canada i am pleased that your dollar is gaing strength. 90 Cents is almost unheard of!
Also, be aware of how his rhetoric towards the US changes, as opposed to past PM's. You all may start to be conditioned to thing us Yanks as your good old friends again. i have a feeling the US will now do everyting in its power to become real buddy buddy with y'all. Just a prediction....
WV:thiswordwilltakeupyourentirememoryandyouwillhavetoremoveaboutthreeprogramstosendthepost ;)
And just to prove my point that Pensacola "ain't that smart"
I offer this from the local TELEVISION STATION website:
Belmont Art Center Bizarre Has Kids' Activities
Now, if you don't know the difference between bizarre and bazaars
...well, apparently neither does the idiot at the TV stations website!
if you are quick you can catch it before they do @ www.weartv.com
Alberta has more "fossil" fuel than all of Saudi Arbia, Iran and Iraq combined. And it's hardly been tapped!
Iran and Iraq hasn't been explored, there's no need when you pump enough already.
We know how big the Tar Sands are.
Jas...are you getting this?
Wax up lad...
http://www.savelivesinmay.com/part3.htm
wv...rycmoby
Whenever I'm in doubt about something I check it's ANAGRAM
'Comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3'
anagrams to
'New con man wants chasm chasm.
or
Schwassmann-Wachmann '
anagrams to
'Hmm! Wanchan scans swan
Thunderbolt.com
May 05, 2006
Comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 Disintegrates
It is happening for "no apparent reasons", scientists say, but the comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 has been rapidly breaking apart, provoking another round of second-guessing by astronomers.
The images above, captured by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, are the best pictures yet of an event that has astronomers scratching their heads. The comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, otherwise known as Comet 73P, is disintegrating in front of their eyes. But what is the cause of this extraordinary event? Not one of the theoretical surmises offered so far has satisfied the community of astronomers as a whole. From all standard vantage points such an event presents inherent—some would say insurmountable—dilemmas.
Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, first observed in 1930 and named after its two German discoverers, completes an orbit every 5.4 years. Following its discovery it was little more than a footnote in comet science until 1995. The first appearance of the comet that year was so bright that astronomers hailed it as a new comet. But as it turned out, the "newcomer" was Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, presenting itself in more glorious dress than ever before, despite the fact that conditions were not favorable. It was 150 million miles away, but shining hundreds of times more brightly than expected.
In early 1996 astronomers discovered that the comet had fragmented into at least three pieces, an occurrence clearly linked to the spectacular brightening, though no one could say what caused the event. It also appeared as if one or more of the pieces was breaking into secondary fragments.
When the comet returned in 2000 it was again brighter than expected, with indications that the disintegration was continuing—or even accelerating. And now, with its most recent appearance, the best Hubble images show dozens of fragments, suggesting the possibility of complete dissolution in a single remaining passage around the Sun.
Meanwhile, the "explanations" proposed for the comet's catastrophic fate can only diminish confidence in today's comet science. Even in the face of falsifying discoveries, the specialists appear unwilling to reconsider their theoretical starting point. One astronomer, from the Sydney Observatory, offered this explanation of the comet's fragmentation: "It's like pouring hot coffee into a glass that's been in the fridge. The glass shatters from the shock". But there is no rational comparison of the two phenomena. Any explanation by resort to "thermal stress" must provide for heat transfer rapidly through thousands of feet of insulating material, something inconceivable even if you ignore the deep freeze of the vacuum through which the comet is moving, with its sunward face continually changing due to rotation.
Another astronomer, from University of Western Ontario, suggested, "The most likely explanation is thermal stress, with the icy nucleus cracking like an ice cube dropped into hot soup". All that this "explanation" requires is a little home experiment. The ice cube will not shatter explosively, or any way display effects comparable to the disintegration of Schwassmann- Wachmann 3—not even if dropped into boiling water. It will melt. And no matter what a comet is composed of, the heat transfer the "theory" implies for a mile-wide solid object is beyond all reason.
In addition to citing possible "thermal stresses", the Hubble Space Telescope website offers other possibilities as to why comets might disintegrate so explosively—"They can also fly apart from rapid rotation of the nucleus, or explosively pop apart like corks from champagne bottles due to the outburst of trapped volatile gases". But the centrifugal forces acting on comet nuclei are close to zero. And to posit heating in the middle of a mile-wide dirty ice cube is, again, scientifically indefensible.
Perhaps then, Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 "was shattered by a hit from a small interplanetary boulder?" offered one of the astronomers quoted above.
"But make that a series of one-in-a-trillion hits", mused a critic of today's comet science. "That way we can explain the continuing fragmentation over years".
Comet science is indeed in trouble, and it is particularly dismaying to see spokesmen for the Hubble site announcing that their telescope may help to "reveal which of these breakup mechanisms are contributing to the disintegration of 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3". Neither NASA, nor the Hubble folks in particular will find evidence for any of the "hypotheses" offered, say the electrical theorists.
From an electrical viewpoint the periodic breakup of comets is no surprise. Fragmentation and disintegration illustrate the same dynamic forces observed in the "surprising" outbursts of comets. Electrical outbursts and complete disintegration are merely matters of degree in a discharging or exploding capacitor, which is exactly what an "active comet" is in the electrical interpretation.
A capacitor, one of the most commonly used devices in electrical engineering, stores electrical charge between layers of insulating material. And that is what a comet moving through regions of different charge will do—it will store electric charge. A comet nucleus can be compared to the insulating material, the dielectric, in a capacitor. As charge is exchanged from the comet’s surface to the solar "wind" (actually an electrically active plasma), electrical energy is stored in the nucleus in the form of charge polarization. This can easily build up intense mechanical stress in the comet nucleus, which may be released catastrophically. And just as a capacitor can explode when its insulation suffers rapid breakdown, a comet can do precisely the same.
As suggested by electrical theorist Wallace Thornhill, "comets break up not because they are chunks of ice 'warming' in the Sun, and not because they are loose aggregations of smaller bodies, but because of electrical discharge within the nucleus itself".
Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, first observed in 1930 and named after its two German discoverers, has never put on a spectacular display comparable to such "Great Comets" of the twentieth century as Halley, Hale-Bopp, and Hyakutake. It is a short-period comet: for electrical theorists that means a lower-voltage comet—and, as a rule, less drama.
Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 completes an orbit every 5.4 years. Its path takes it from just beyond the orbit of Jupiter to inside the orbit of Earth. But it does not visit the more remote regions of the solar system, while the spectacular "Great Comets" spend long periods adjusting in that more negative environment of the Sun's domain before racing sunward. What Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 does exhibit, however, is a highly elliptical (elongated) orbit, so in electrical terms that means more rapid transit through the Sun's electric field and more intense stresses on the capacitor than would be the case were the comet moving on a less eccentric path between the regions of Jupiter's and Earth's orbits.
The comet is presently headed toward perihelion, or closest approach to the Sun (within 87.3 million miles), on June 6. Well before then, on May 12th it will pass within 7.3 million miles of Earth. Though that is roughly 30 times the distance of the Moon from Earth, many earthbound and space telescopes should capture images of the comet in sufficient resolution to provide additional critical tests of the electrical model.
Coming Monday, May 8, 2006—
Comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 Disintegrates (2)
Predictions of the Electric Model
Crypto said....
was the demand for TV shows a "public" demand ?
I have my doubts now. Television was the fastest and easiest way to spread the message. Any basic history of television course in college will go over the fact that televisions "debut" was all but quashed because of WWII. It suddenly EXPLODED right after the war. I have heard explanations ranging from lack of able personel due to men running off to war (I guess Rosie could rivet, but not write/produce) to war rations made production of sets impossible. While I give a certain amount of creedance to the latter, it still doesn't explain where all the expendable income came from for those families to actually purchase the sets once production boomed. All those War Bonds I guess.....
From www.tvhistory.tv
(in 1946)
RCA begins production of 630-TS, the first television designed and manufactured after the war. Approximately 10,000 units sold by the end of the year, with about 43,000 sold of this model before production ends in 1949. Other manufacturers used the RCA chassis, and placed it in a cabinet of their own design. The initial RCA selling price was $352.
a breakdown of the sheer volume of set production can be found here:
http://www.tvhistory.tv/1947-53-USA-TV-MonthlyProduction.JPG
In short, production went from 178,571 in 1947 to a whopping 7,261,109 at the end of December 1953.
Now, if the average set is $350 (which, by the way was a tremendous amount of money to the average Joe back then, right???)
You can do the math...
Now, I need to research the advertising of those TV's. Who was sponsoring it? Who was on the board of directors at RCA? bet ya nickles to donughts they have some kind of government connection.
The Elites deal in second-hand information, the Aliens don't have the CONCEPT of evil.
The flow-chart on my website shows this.
This explains Robert's (and our) frustration with the delays in getting super-tech.
FIFTEEN has more power than anybody !!
And low and behold, I forget about David Sarnoff. DUH!
A quick Bio here:
DAVID SARNOFF. Born near Minsk, Russia, 27 February 1891. Attended public schools, Brooklyn, New York, U.S.A.; studied electrical engineering at Pratt Institute. Married: Lizette Hermant, 1917; three sons. Joined Marconi Wireless Company, 1906-19, telegraph operator, 1908, promoted to chief radio inspector and assistant chief engineer, when Marconi was absorbed by Radio Corporation of America (RCA), 1919-70, commercial manager; elected general manager, RCA, 1921, vice president and general manager, 1922, executive vice president, 1929, president, 1930; invested in development of television during 1930s; chair of board, RCA, 1947-70; oversaw RCA's manufacture of color television sets and NBC's color broadcasts. Received 27 honorary degrees, including doctoral degrees from Columbia University and New York University. Died in New York City, 12 December 1971.
http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/S/htmlS/sarnoffdavi/sarnoffdavi.htm
So do TPTB go to Sarnoff and say "hey, you want to get back at mother country?...build like MAD, and by the way the Rockefellers are gonna bankroll the whole thing b/c they have designs on world power...."
sounds plausible to me. :)
And just when you thought this had nothing to do with FSHOD I bring it around to this: A quick google of Tesla and Sarnoff brought up this dandy little web page:
http://www.frank.germano.com/blackbox.htm
"Employed by the Rockefellers in their RCA venture, Tesla was given the task of restructuring the now failing Marconi System. David Sarnoff did not permit Tesla the dignity of working under his own name! Nevertheless it was Tesla, not Sarnoff, who redesigned the insufficient RCA radio systems to sufficiently turn a profit for the owners."
I rest my case.
would they have known back then about tv's mind numbing potential, and subliminal messaging applications.
I read that we dont blink while string at da toob
ogxoubanfhlqqrzawrnmsnread
sorry I meant staring at da toob
The Toob had a Wet Dream and they call that THE MATRIX
Bubba,
my point here is that the television and its HUGE expansion was partly due to the Gov't new need to brainwash the public into believeing that the "Commie bastards" were kncoking on our door and at any miniute they were gonna come get us. it was a propaganda tool and who else to aid in its quick and efficent roll out but none other than, and you are correct, General Sarnoff. ( he prefered to be called general Sarnoff as opposed to plain old Mister)Now, he was not only in control of the production of the tool for the propaganda, but also its programming. Yes, no returning soldier wanted to see anything distasteful after what horrors he had already seen...good argument.But I don't think thats the full story here. the new television landscape filled with good vs evil themes. indian bad white man good westerns...yet at the same time the culture of television families and portayals of those families becomes instantly sanitized. The reason why Archie Bunker was soooo shocking, was not so much what he said, but rather a nation finally was able to recognize what a REAL family looked like. More families resembled Archie Bunker than ever did The Cleavers. EVER. Even in 1955. By 1970 the nation had Vietnam to worry about and the cold war was being in the fought in the swamps and TV didn't need to be the sanitizer anymore. But the gov't had proved its point by then...they had effectively taken a nation, brain washed it, sanitized it and protected it. WE STAVED OFF COMMUNISIM!!! televising McCarthy hearings I'm sure helped a bit too....
that fits with the commie threat being another fake scam.
the elite invented socialism, communism?
then they invented the scary cold war?
tv sure helped the agenda?
its all fascism in various packages?
The sleeping sheeple need to be awakened, impending war with Iran might just do that !!
Uni,
I don't think that the commie thing was so much a scam as it was exaggerated. We have the benefit of hindsight knowing that Communisim just doesn't work very well. Could they have known that in 1947? Perhaps. But it all had to do with The Bomb. We had it and dammit we were gonna have the monopoly on it come hell or high water. In order to keep that monopoly we had to make sure that IF Russia developed it we were still gonna be in the drivers seat by having 2. To make the american public Ok with the arms race, we had to make sure that they were Ok with pouring all this money into building more and more and more all the while making sure to keep the impression up that the commies were gonna come and eat out children. We became the "Greatest Nation on Earth" not so much through all of our freedoms, but by pointing out everone elses LACK of them..and especially Russia's.
Fast Forward today...where are our freedoms??? The threat from Russia isn't there (anymore, if it ever was) so we trade it in on the ever present and shadowy "terrorist". Only this time the gov't dupes us into giving up the thing that made this Nation "so great". Our freedoms.
Now, its game over for the American people...its a damn good thing they still have TV. if nothing else than to remember what the good ole days looked like.
will NEVER reveal a free energy source. There is an inherent disincentive to do so,
The Labyrinth Group.
The name says it all !! It's a maze whose players run around with a Hawking Box, trying to make it pay . . .
Forward the Revolution !
Fifteen does not support the "next war."
Press that Button and trained cadres of Communists will arrange a TV "special" STARRING YOU presented without commercial interruption . . .
Whoops !
Gog/Magog/Meshach/Tubal
Roger
4000 plus miles of bike riding in total
I'm confident I can keep up with the Wagon Train containing the {
}
The statues
are not ready.
Ps_op (Viagra) is like a chafed raw nerve. The under cover buyer at the corner store is called an anti-terrorist specialist. Fourteen years on the fx. "He was a very good anti-terrorist specialist".
The Vatican celebrated 500 years of the "mostly ceremonial Swiss guard" today. 33 new guards joined their ranks.
A British helicopter was shot down over Basra. The crowd of mostly Shiite celebrated in the streets by firebombing British tanks and man carriers. "Basra is not like Baghdad. We've never had any problems here" where the oil gets exported out of the country" reported one of the Blackwater security patrols.
So the war on drugs has been exported to Canada. It is now called the war on Terror.
They might have wanted to keep their internal brainwashing to themselves.
So it shall play out
Harper wants to be the Man !!
Sword said...
Whenever I'm in doubt about something I check it's ANAGRAM
You know I did the same thing - only I came up with:
"Drink more oval-teen"
There are no D T's in Schwassmann-Wachmann
really.
scarletm said...
And just when you thought this had nothing to do with FSHOD I bring it around to this: A quick google of Tesla and Sarnoff brought up this dandy little web page
You've done it again.. An awesome site with great potential.. Bryansail will be thankful..
A different spin on UFO's compared to yesterdays story about the hacker;
UFO study finds no sign of aliens
Blurbage;
A confidential Ministry of Defence report on Unidentified Flying Objects has concluded that there is no proof of alien life forms.
In spite of the secrecy surrounding the UFO study, it seems citizens of planet Earth have little to worry about.
The report, which was completed in 2000 and stamped "Secret: UK Eyes Only", has been made public for the first time.
Only a small number of copies were produced and the identity of the man who wrote it has been protected.
-----------------
Wayne
sword said;
Thanks Wayne!
On that matter - and on the matter of the "Big Dig" - is it in between two rivers?
Theres got to be more to that story that just that one link...
Sword
Saturday, May 06, 2006 8:59:35 PM
Well, I want to know too. The "Big Dig", if you are refering to the new embassy, that was said to be on the east bank of the Tigris. For the life of me, beyond artifacts and oil, I am having a hard time figuring out what else might be so important there.
sword again;
Snowball comet?
It seems to make certain sense if the originating body was a large saltwater planet - TIAMAT?
Sword
Saturday, May 06, 2006 10:11:00 PM
Earth is the surviving portion of Tiamat. That is what I remember from the 12th Planet. Kingu was/is the Moon. After getting slammed by "Northwind:, one of Nibiru's moons, Tiamat/Kingu were forced into their new orbit becoming Earth and the Moon as we know them. If I am in error here, someone add a correction.
scarletm said;
"To make the american public Ok with the arms race, we had to make sure that they were Ok with pouring all this money into building more and more and more all the while making sure to keep the impression up that the commies were gonna come and eat out children"
IF TV was supposed to tbe the great sanitizer and belittler of communism, how did Rod Serling and The Twilight Zone get into the fray? That show went way out in it's portrayal of;
-families who built bomb shelters and the irrational behavior in a time of great panic
-ET/UFO's and their visits to Earth. An ET comes, the locals string him up and ruin his "gift" he brings. He brought the cure for cancer.
Where and how di that show slide into primetime TV? Hmmmm.
Wayne
scarletm said...
And just to prove my point that Pensacola "ain't that smart"
If it ain't that smart, it's cuz of all the Yankees that are ruining what was once a good thing. Ignorance is global...the South does NOT have a premium on it.
The Porter Goss story is getting legs. Caught out with the boys in a poker prostitute scam and a congressman bribe? Sup wit dat?
Crypt0,
Some very interesting posts, thanks.
re: TV, ever noticed thin links between anthropoligal studies and advertising? It's like NASA and the coming powers-to-be in space where the taxpayer-funded basic research is then used to make big $$$s....when studying anthropology, I was amazed at the research that had so many obvious linkages to use by Wall Street PR for TV.
Now, not to be confrontational at all, but sometimes you write things that fill in the blanks quite nicely but, when considered for a moment, make no sense...at least to me. Help me with this....
" the economic blind-spot of Star Trek (cleansed to avoid the self-censorship and sensibilities)."
Just what does than mean or to what are you referring?
Sword
Saturday, May 06, 2006 10:11:00 PM
Earth is the surviving portion of Tiamat. That is what I remember from the 12th Planet. Kingu was/is the Moon. After getting slammed by "Northwind:, one of Nibiru's moons, Tiamat/Kingu were forced into their new orbit becoming Earth and the Moon as we know them. If I am in error here, someone add a correction
The dimension of spacetime is not being addressed. When we talk about magnetism we are talking about lifeforce. The pulse of the planets, stars, suns, and every other physical reality of love. These "families" of mass hanging in the vacuum of space looped into time and enfolded in relationships we call gravity have just enough sense to leave us alone unless and until we mess with that relationship and play with fire.
We reap what we sow. When I and I know it's only me, say
zero=infinity=God, I am saying that the essence of a Creator cannot be expressed leaving something left over to call God. He is Omni and He put His all into His work.
Overal, it's ben a couple of very good days at FSHOD...My compliments, friends.
Of couse, I do see some minor dyzinformatzya continuing for the usual sources, AND Bio_Unit, tho he's had a few startlingly lucid moments, continues to maintain his niche in the Psy-Op formula mentioned in the Blog.
BU,
I, and I'm sure others here, would prefer that you not use racial slurs (e.g. your use of the *N* word) here. I understand the context in which you used it, but it wasn't necessary to use to get the point across. Call it oppression, censorship....it's NOT, but I don't give a damn...I just think we can operate on a higher plane here. I've seen you do better than that...why you regress and descend to the depths so frequently, I don't know. But again, I'd appreciate it if you'd desist with the racial slurs, please.
just a trivial symbolic something in accord with the 3's and twin trinities.
It was reported that last year(2005) Canada's population reached 33 million.
oh and one more: anybody notice how the number for information anywhere in the world is 555-1212?
...musings of a sleepy mind.
Sword..you want it you got it..
NEW BABYLON>>>
Baghdad anger at Bush's undiplomatic palace
Daniel McGrory, Baghdad
May 04, 2006
THE question puzzles and enrages a city: how is it that the Americans cannot keep the electricity running in Baghdad for more than a couple of hours a day, yet still manage to build the biggest embassy on earth?
Irritation grows as residents deprived of airconditioning and running water three years after the US-led invasion watch the massive US embassy they call "George W's palace" rising from the banks of the Tigris.
In the pavement cafes, people moan that the structure is bigger than anything Saddam Hussein built. They are not impressed by the architects' claims that it will be visible from space and cover an area larger than Vatican City. They are more interested in knowing whether the US State Department paid for the prime real estate or simply took it.
While families suffer electricity cuts, queue all day to fuel their cars and wait for water pipes to be connected, the US mission, due to open in June next year, will have its own power and water plants to cater for a population the size of a small town.
The design of the compound is supposed to be a secret, but you cannot hide the concrete contours of the 21 buildings that are taking shape.
Looming over the skyline, the embassy has the distinction of being the only big US building project in Iraq that is on time and within budget. In a week when Washington revealed a startling list of missed deadlines and overspending on building projects, Congress was told the bill for the embassy was $US592million ($772million).
The heavily guarded 42ha site - which will have a 3m-thick perimeter wall - has hundreds of workers swarming on scaffolding. Locals are bitter that the Kuwaiti contractor has employed only foreign staff.
Diplomats, after roughing it in Saddam's abandoned palaces, should have every comfort in their new home. The plans are rumoured to include the biggest swimming pool in Iraq, a gymnasium, a cinema, restaurants offering delicacies from US food chains, tennis courts and a swish American Club for functions.
A State Department official said the size reflected the "massive amount of work still facing the US and our commitment to see it through".
You may have to read between the lines
Jeff Wells...Rigourous Intuition
First, as DailyKos convincingly argues, the true scandal of the Duke Cunningham hooker story is likely the gender of the hookers. There are some very carefully parsed statements regarding Brent Wilkes' Watergate "hospitality suites," such as the claim of the lawyer for Shirlington Limo's Chris Baker that his client was "never in attendance in any party where any women were being used for prostitution purposes."
Cunningham staked out ground in Congress as a particularly gross character, describing his 1998 prostate operation as "just not natural, unless maybe you’re Barney Frank.” Frank noted that Cunningham "tends to frequently blurt out stuff on gay issues. He seems to be more interested in discussing homosexuality than most homosexuals." Two years earlier Cunningham had baited Frank on the Massachusetts Democrat's own hooker scandal, cutting him off in debate with "Would you like to talk about prostitutes and basements?" (Interestingly, it was only the Barney Frank angle that found any traction in the press and with the general public following The Washington Times' flap of child hookers on the Hill stories in 1989.)
But Cunningham is himself deeply and unhappily closeted, according to Chris Crain of The Washington Blade:
Cunningham, who is married with grown children, has admitted to romantic, loving relationships with men, both during his Vietnam military service and as a civilian. That was the remarkable story that this publication reported two years ago, when Elizabeth Birch, the former Human Rights Campaign leader, inadvertently outed Cunningham at a gay rights forum.
Birch never mentioned Cunningham’s name, but she talked about a rabidly anti-gay congressman who asked to meet privately with her in the midst of a controversy over his use in a speech on the floor of the House the term "homos" to describe gays who have served in the military. Alone with Birch and an HRC staffer, the unnamed congressman shared that he had loved men during his life. In telling the story, Birch offered up a few too many details about the closeted congressman.
As for Porter Goss, Cannonfire does an excellent job of linking his abrupt resignation to an ongoing investigation of the Cunningham fiasco through CIA Executive Director Kyle "Dusty" Foggo's ties to Brent Wilkes.
The CIA, of course, is the genuine Mac Daddy of Capitol Hill prostitution. If Craig Spence could talk, he would, and so he can't. The Agency's interest in prostitution as a tool of blackmail and political leverage happened before at the Watergate, and may have even be closer to the truth of Nixon's fall than the "second-rate burglary." So to the degree Goss and Foggo may be involved, I think it's safe to assume it wasn't for their own personal "stress management."
Also, coincidentally or not, Jeff Gannon chose this of all weeks to acknowledge publically for the first time that yes, in fact, he is a gay man. The admission came during the panel session of the Equality Forum, and was apparently so difficult for him he had trouble forming the words, even before a largely gay audience.
Gannon was asked where he slept during his White House overnights, but he was saved from responding by the moderators. It was the decent thing to do.
ericswan said:
"The heavily guarded 42ha site - which will have a 3m-thick perimeter wall -"
There you have it: Fortress America.
1. Psy-Ops as disinformation;
2. Psy-Ops as mind-shaping (or mind-f88king, as the case may be)
Today's newspaper headlines in Singapore:
People's Action Party (same'o, same'o) wins strong mandate. Receives 66.6% of votes. Gets 84 out of 86 parlimentary seats.
All newspapers are Govt controlled here. There was a major drop in the electoral support for the ruling party. The norm is about 75%. Yesterday's poll was one of the worst ever recorded, and a bad start for the Prime Minister, who's father was singapore's first PM (1959-1990) and is still the strong-man behind the scenes.
What the news did not says was:
Opposition parties receive unprecedented 33.3% of votes. (talk about synchronicity)
Ruling party achieved 16.7% majority.
Singapore practices British first-past-the-post elections. That is why the ruling party got 84 out of 86 seats even with a 16% majority.
It does not practice proportional % representation. WTF!
The word "Mandate" is used purposefully, in Chinese cultural context : the Emperor has the Mandate of Heaven to Rule. It is a Divine Right. Looks like lots of Divine Retribution ahead :P
There you have it folks: 9 days of psy-ops and news-censorship, the sheeple fall for the bait (again), and a phyrric victory and heroic loss.
But thanks to the internet, the younger voters used YouTube and Google video to let everyone see what REALLY was going on at the polical rallies held across the island. History was made: a crowd of 80,000 at one rally on Friday.
In related news: The Govt has announced yesterday that it will be seriously looking into the impact of the internet on the elections process (ie public sharing videos, pictures and speeches which have been censored on the news) and fine-tune the laws (they mean TIGHTEN them).
The govt does NOT like Disclosure. It only has the Official Version / News.
WTF! North Korea with Malls!
Great link Scarletm, you rock!
The "fountain effects" mentioned on your website appears to be the
term used by Tesla for what is later referred to as an "avalanche" or
"cascade" of energy, also referred to as the "radiant event."
Some of the best evidence of this huge energy gain being real comes
from Leonard B. Loeb (physics professor U of California
at Berkeley and John M. Meek Research Engineer; publisher: Stanford
University,--their work was published in 1941! (I would have boldfaced
published in 1941 if I knew how) Prior to that (1936) Professor Townsend laid
the foundation for the study of the mechanism of the electrical spark
discharge. On a personal note, I keep re-reading this stuff over and
over, trying to get to the point where I understand it well (really
wish I had a bigger brain type deal)
This secret is the hammer that is going to smash the elites shiny little
wagon. Of course that it has been secreted for a hundred years is
not encouraging, but now we have incentives based on oil projections,
soot particulates and fish loaded with mercury.
It may turn out to be that the greed for profits by the oilco's
stimulates the search for free energy beyond a level that they
can contain. So far they have kept every thing in check but if
peak oil is psy ops, hopefully it is one that backfires, like a
choking engine. A massive push to turn to alternate energy sources
would likely stimulate the economy tremendously and it will take
a lot of oil to get it cranking. I wonder some about Bush's
statement on an amazing new energy source, I think that may be
one of those statements that crypto mentioned as one Bushie wasn't
really supposed to make.
It would be fascinating to see a political candidate rise, taking
on subjects with the same illumination seen here at the f-shod of
course she / he would have to be taken out.
Back to Tesla though, Scarletm's website http://www.frank.germano.com/blackbox.htm
has a link for the book Secrets of Cold War Technology: Project HAARP and Beyond, by Gerry Vassilatos, Our Price: $15.95 - This book comes highly recommended by Peter Lindemann
as an essential addition to anyone researching "cold electricity" (or Radiant energy) or... or.... or.............
I haven't read the book but I can say with certainty that Lindemann is
considered an expert on Tesla's arcing fascinations.
crypto said-(said some more compelling things than this butt...)
Remember the Snotlaws ? (Waltons spelled backwards)
Episode that made me gag : John Walton Sr loses his job and says, "We're gonna live on love"
even at age 11, I knew that their version of events was not accurate ...
Try to describe the first time you realized that Hollywood was white-washing something ...
Was it the Great Depression ?
For example, people on the Prairies hear one story from grandparents and another from TV
Ok, that be true from my experience also-my Grandparents stern manner in recounting those
days is vivid, they darken like a storm cloud! - but LMAO off at imagining being the actor playing
John Walton Sr. I would have broken up laughing if I had to deliver that line to my large
farmin' family with all seriousness, I mean they would have wasted a hell of a lot of film
from me flubbing that line ! take 33 ! lol
TV is a wickedly far reaching medium. For the past week I haven't watched it, but my family
and thus me logged a lot of time watching the idiotbox, ohh sure we were 'choosy' about our
viewing lol, but I watched programing because my parents watched, they forced me to watch
'roots' I was made to watch, as it was deemed important by my then PTB, and if your parents
are watching Golden Girls, then Golden Girls it is!
I have watched tv in the past week but only, TWC and CURRENT TV (brought to you by google) Current
TV on occasion has some amazing little segments (North Koreans defecting to China, sent
back to Korea when caught to be tortured and / or murdered, or another about tourists
filming in China) but the commercials are all Wallstreet. It's like watching PBS, and
noting who some of the contributors are.
I haven't been watching television because of radiant energy.
I haven't been eating because of radiant energy. I haven't been washing because of.... whoah, sorry
there I got a little carried away there,, When I finish the circuit
(the circuit won't 'finish' me I promise) I'll submit to Sunking what I've found.
It will be before autumn of 2006 anyways !!! So hold tight because an 'avalanche'
of info. is coming, information that smashes through the illusion of requiring oil to run
cars. I'll be sure to include amperage information for b u. (a crude demonstration
of the working force was demonstrated in the image of Gray's chief engineer Hackenburger
snapping a magnet from a capacitor into the ceiling with force-the application of that
working force is what was used to drive Edwin Grays automotive motor)
Any hoos its a bird chirping May day here, I'm going to check on the status of the
ozone layer while re-reading quantum physics over and over and over and over until
my head splits in two from a hot electricity!
Oh, is this disinfo? Sent to me by my Aunt early Sat. morning-note the seriousness
here? ...
SUBJECT FLUORESENT BULBS
FYI -I heard again this morning that for every incandesent bulb you replace with a low-impact fluoresent bulb, it has the same effect as removing the carbon emissions of 1 million cars. . I know that sounds unbelievable, but I've heard this from several environmental groups. Happy Saturday,
hmmmm
Here's my word verification YOU read it out iufcdjk hmmm someONE has good sense of humour!
Sword said...
BTW - Where landing inside a small coridor of "Cydonia" that dosen't have anything under it. (he he - thanks Landsat-M)
Well be there for the "guided" tour...
Assuming 'Where' = 'We're, who is 'We'?
Cann you identify what you mean by "doesn't have anything under it", and specify that location?
else, see Blog Item#,,,huh, wait for it...3!
History Channel has a show on right no re: Comets/Deep Impact/Nasa/JPL.
eh...belay that...that's OLD dyzinformatzya showing on TCH right now.
Crypt0,
re: Star trek Q&A, I think there was an underlying assumption that a social change had occurred that corrected the rich-get-richer type of ill and many other types. Recall that at that time there was still a feeling that "We Can make it Happen", that 'We Can Chaaaaange the World...Rearraaaaaaeaaaaaange the World".
If one also considers that, in the story plot, that we now knew and worked with several non-human intelligences, that assumption is strengthened, that we would have undergone many societal changes, and that our outer expansion into the Galaxy/Universe had made such crapola obsolete. All I knew is that I saw a dream of all people working together with their common welfare at heart and each contribution given it's due importance. No doubt the same feeling submarine crew shares...or those in Utopia? :)
on this THC show, this fellow Scott Sandford at Nasa Ames Research Center looks like the Abdominable Snowman (The Bumble) in the old Rudolf The Red-Nosed Reindeer. LMAO!
So it would seem....and/or capitalizing on the interest on the Julien's SP73 interest. Interesting to witness how THC will show something with current relevance at just the right time.
PR...or Dyzinfo?
Sword,
Very well, the public Nasa, then. However, when you say "We" (e.g. "Where" = "we're") it is implied that you are referring to this mysterious organization that you've convinced the more gullible you belong to. Your indication, upon questioning, that you refer to NASA, makes me wonder what organization you've been referring to whenever you used the "We" apellation.
This highlights the problem I am having with your longterm use of the 'ambiguous', the 'mystery' you try to generate by speaking in such general terms and implying that some overseer if looking over your shoulder and you might get caught.
Hence, my BS meter is pegged and why I've called for you, IF you have true things to disclose (as you so often seemingly do), to say so in explicit terms to clarify what it is you are perhaps disclosing.
If in fact you have nothing to disclose, I ain't mad at ya...all 'seekers of light' are welcome here. But if so, stop trying to be a Myster Merchant, no need to "put on airs", as we say in the South...we just folk, here.
What's the tri-network, Sword.
No. I didn't know that. Very enlightening, thank you!
Logicspark (and anybody else),
Sorry old man, I neglected to acknowledge you the other day. I had meant to type something to you and now cannot recall what it was. Forgive and Regards.
Oh...I think I was going to commiserate with you because you were being made out to be a bad man because you were an EE. ;)
A&E owns THC and TBC (Biography Channel). Discovery owns itself, TLC, Animal Planet, THE Science Channel, The Military Channel and a few other innocuous channels.
How bout dat?
Wayne
10:00pm tonight on THC, Meteors: Fire In The Sky. Most likely new. Timely? Maybe soon to be timely? Getting us ready for something? Mega Disasters, new show on THC. Same MO? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Wayne
That Breathing Moonrocks link that Bohemia posted above was pretty interesting...new research about getting oxygen from moonrocks/soil. Extract O2, the use remnant 'slag' for shielding or bricks or whatever. There's all kinds of metals on the Moon, too.
So not only are 'they' now getting serious about Mars, but the Moon also.
continues to maintain his niche in the Psy-Op formula
How can that possibly be ?
If you're confused about what the "media" is and does don't drag me into your paranoid delusions !!
Everything is Evil according to moi, Everything is Love according to Eric.
Choose one or the Other, and quit your sissy whining !!
How many Great Thinkers concluded everything is evil ?
All of the Gnostics, or anyone who hears about the Crucifixion and think "God Wins !!"
What's deserve got anything to do with it ?
How do you explain NEW JERSEY ??
(gotcha !)
I think God is a Corleone.
There might be a form of Cosmic Evolution, that's what the WingMakers say, we are long separated from them but will eventually rejoin them "more perfected"
I'm watching Gene Hackman beat up Clint Eastwood (SWEET !)
->sword said;
Thanks Wayne!
On that matter - and on the matter of the "Big Dig" - is it in between two rivers?
Theres got to be more to that story that just that one link...
Sword<-
Well, wasn't the Garden of Eden supposedly situated between the rivers Tigris and Euphrates? Sitchin tells us that the Sumerians believe modern humans were created by the Anunnaki in their Earthbound lab known as E-DIN in the same general location. So, are we seeking the oldest genetics lab around, Sword?
DarkWood
Crypto,
That pretty well covers at least one of the reasons I personally despise all religion. The racism in all of 'em pretty well sickens me and proves (to me) that they're all good and full of the shit they likes to spew. ;)
DarkWood
Disgruntled? Not so much. I'm more sympathetic to those who remain in mental bondage to the dogma pushers while I seek Deity on my own terms.
If more had the courage to do the same, I think we could live in a much better world. Instead, the priest-king cults thrive and their powerhungry bloodlust threatens to destroy us all.
It would be kinda funny if it weren't so pathetically sad.
DarkWood
Darkwood,
Genetics lab in the E.DIN. I believe in Sitchen's writing, the genetics were done in the AB.ZU (?) Africa, because that is where the mines were. That is were the "mutiny" took place and EN.KI and NIN.HUR.SAG did the manipulations.
As for racism/bigotry in religion. I was at a first holy communion party for an autistic child. The Mom was relating to us how when they got to the church the nuns wanted them in another room away from the "normal" kids. The Mom actually had to press the nuns for her right not to be in another room before the ceremony. What BS! I think that says it all.
Wayne
Wayne,
I hear ya, brudda. I was raised in a fundie church where I was taught such wondrous ideas as God's curse on and marking of Cain was to blacken his skin thus originating the black race. For some reason I felt the need to point out the ridiculousness of this all the while knowing that I was speaking to the deaf. The final insult, I suppose, was my suggestion that, considering the area of human origin, it would make more sense to suggest that the mark was a ligtening of the skin thus originating the white race. I have since learned that discretion sometimes truly is the better part of valor, hehehe.
DarkWood
Darkwood said;
I have since learned that discretion sometimes truly is the better part of valor, hehehe.
DarkWood
Monday, May 08, 2006 8:11:36 AM
Amen! nn Hallelujah! ;)
Wayne
LOL, Darkwood!
B_U,
To save me from reading a link I'm sre you posted last week or before, what exactly are the 'Wingmakers' you refer to?
Sword,
My friend, I am not entirely a simpleton. Reasonably versed in religion, symbology, science, history and the esoteric stuff we all seem to dig. I ain't that smart, but I ain't that dumb, either!
Therefore, why is it that I have no idea what it is that you have been supposedly been 'disclosing'? You are either not disclosing anything, or you are having a problem communicating it!. If one of you other Crewe have discerned that which I have not, please step forward, via post or email and clue me in and ask forgiveness for my error.
I am not bald-facedly calling you a liar. Or even comparing you to Geobbels (the pic on the blog, a master of psy-op and
propaganda)... But I am, and have been this past week, calling on you to state clearly and without the associated 'mystery' that you work so hard to try to weave about yourself, WHAT IS YOUR DISCLOSURE?
You make much of meeting RCH, that much I understand. But just what the hell was talked about, well I haven't the faintest notion.
If the problem is with the communication of this mystery, then it might be because you've spread it out over many posts. Perhaps by putting it all in one post/blog, you might be able to clarify what you are trying to tell us.
I feel that there are some serious people here at FSHOD, people that post thougts and links to actual, real data. Bryan, Bohemia, Crypt0, Eric, etc. Ion, T, etc get to the spiritual nature of things. Scarlet, Wayne, Starship, V, Mac kinda wax between the scientific and political. And all the others who I might have overlooked here in my moment of....forthrightness? My problem is this....so much of the great stuff people post gets entirely pushed aside, seemingly, when you come along with your Magical Myster Tour. Same with Clan Destine, whose first post on the Captain's Blog SCREAMED BS...yet people get all caught up in this web of chiaroscuro woven by the Mystery Merchants and fall all over themselves every 3 months or so when y'all pop in and out of this blog...and I say that it is Deflection and Disruption and Dyzinformatzya and that we're missing the real 'stuff' by paying attention to the MMs static.
Trust me...I BEG you to prove me wrong! I WANT there to be some grand disclosure that leads to the enlightement of humanity...or ensure the survival of the species.
But if NOT...just be one of the regular joes and we'll have fun and learn together without the DDDs.
So for the last time, put your cards on the table, sir.
Crypt0,
Ole Elijah Mohammed musta had some reeeeeal good hashish!
I'm, sure Sitchin has interjected some 'theory' into his writings, but isn't most of it backed up by some ancient writings? hmmm...well they, too, could be something as wild as what ElM has written. But I think there is a vast difference between Stichin and this fellow.
I think..............................
LOL. W V = poophe
Here is disclosure.. I don't (haven't) read RCH because his page wouldn't fit my screen. Bubba Hyde suggested I change my screen resolution from 760 to 1048 to fit G-Deck which I did and just moments ago visited TEM and scrolled down to Moon With A View (for the first time) and discovered that it now fits my monitor. I didn't have to scroll left to right and up and down after all.
My question to Sword would be what more could RCH say about the moon that hasn't already been discussed in Alternative 3? As I recall, you said anyone given that "knowledge" usually reacted with a technicolour rainbow.
Sword..there is a bit more you should know about the 104 acre site on the bank of the Tigris; The 21 buildings are situated between main streets that form a pentagon and the buildings can be seen from the moon in the shape of a swastika.
lifted this from another blog..
http://www.wanttoknow.info/060501conspiracyofsilence
Conspiracy of Silence" is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a nationwide child abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government. Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, "Conspiracy of Silence" reveals how rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic child abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.
Based on DeCamp's riveting book, The Franklin Cover-up, "Conspiracy of Silence" begins with the shut-down of Nebraska's Franklin Community Federal Credit Union after a raid by federal agencies in November 1988 revealed that $40 million was missing. When the Nebraska legislature launched a probe into the affair, what initially looked like a financial swindle soon exploded into a startling tale of drugs, money laundering, and a nationwide child abuse ring. Nineteen months later, the legislative committee's chief investigator died suddenly and violently, like more than a dozen other people linked to the Franklin case.
So why have you never heard of the Franklin cover-up? Originally scheduled to air in May of 1994 on the Discovery Channel, "Conspiracy of Silence" was yanked at the last minute due to formidable pressure applied by top politicians. Some very powerful people did not want you to watch this documentary. Thanks to the wonderful power of the Internet, three different links below take you to this eye-opening documentary. Other links provide detailed information about the case, reliable media coverage, and places to order DeCamp's revealing book, The Franklin Cover-up.
Beware that you may find yourself becoming angry or upset while watching "Conspiracy of Silence." Many people do. However, I invite you to consider that each of us, myself included, has at times in our life acted out of selfish motives when it comes to sexuality and ended up hurting others in one way or another. Let us take this information not only as a call to stop this kind of abuse at the nationwide level, but also as a call to examine our own sexual relationships and make a commitment to deep honesty and integrity in our own lives around this most sensitive issue. Thanks for caring, and may we all work together to build a brighter future for ourselves and for our world.
With best wishes,
Fred Burks for the WantToKnow.info Team
Former language interpreter for Presidents Bush and Clinton
"Conspiracy of Silence" (55 minutes) is available for free viewing at the three links below:
http://www.franklincase.org/silence.htm - best quality of these three (free Windows Media Player required)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=359924937663867563 - "Conspiracy of Silence" on Google Video
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/141003conspiracyofsilence.html - see note below
Note: The final link above includes a copy of the front page of the Washington Times with a top headline and story published on the Franklin case. Scroll down and click on the images to read the full story. DeCamp's commentary on "Conspiracy of Silence" and more can be found below the newspaper articles there. Or for another easy-to-read copy of the Times article, click here.
Dozens of media articles on the Franklin case which led to "Conspiracy of Silence:"
http://www.franklincase.org/articles.htm
For an excellent website filled with information about the Franklin case:
http://www.franklincase.org
Lots of strange internet attacks happening, strange "trolls" showing up at forums starting divide and conquer wars. And for all of the other "woo-woos" out there (myself included) comets coming, rapture coming, and the strange reverse speech follower Peggy Kane last post saying that the game is up, the evil ones are leaving on a great ship hidden in the ocean (hmm right where the comets are supposed to hit). And that the "net" will burn and we will finally be able to see for the first time.
May is sure ramping up quick
Thunderbolt.info
May 08, 2006
Comet Schwassman-Wachmann 3 Disintegrates (2)
Predictions of the Electric Model
Worldwide telescopic observations continue to record the catastrophic dissolution of Comet Schwassman-Wachmann 3, offering critical tests of both the standard model and its alternative, the electric comet.
Modern instruments are finding secrets of comets that throw accepted theory into turmoil. The appearance of each comet is followed by the appearance of new, often contradictory, models. And rather than help to reconcile the competing and mutually contradictory models, each new discovery seems only to add to the gap between prior theory and actual discovery.
Any theory seeking to explain comet behavior must account for the defining attributes of comets. And one peculiarity now on the minds of cometologists is the unpredictable fragmentation of comets, often at distances from the Sun that eliminate the appeal to gravitational stresses on the comet. In fact, eighty percent of comets that split do so when they are far from the Sun, according to Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan, authors of the book Comet. Thus the authors conceded, "the problem remains unsolved".
Why has Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 fragmented so rapidly in its most recent approach? We know that in its passage in 1995 it broke into at least three fragments. But now "an amazing process of hierarchical destruction is taking place, in which the larger fragments are continuing to break up into smaller chunks". (See ESA movie of the breakup here). Given the surge of attention on the comet, more information will surely be forthcoming in the weeks ahead as observatories begin to announce their findings. But even now the predictions of the electric model contrast so sharply with those of the standard model that we are confident in registering these preliminary observations and predictions—
The most noticeable thing is that the comet fragments do not "light up" until they are a considerable distance from the comet nucleus. This is contrary to the argument that the cometary display is due to exposed ices sublimating in sunlight. We should then expect that the fragments would expose fresh ices and appear bright from the moment they leave the nucleus. In contrast, the electrical model expects the fragments to be at the same voltage as the parent nucleus, so that they will not begin to discharge and form their own cometary display until they leave the immediate electrical influence of the parent. In addition, the brightness of each fragment will vary as it moves in and out of the current filaments from the parent comet and other fragments. And it will fade as the charge on the fragment is dissipated.
At the heart of comet theory is the astronomers' unsubstantiated claim that cometary displays are largely a result of water evaporation. In contrast, electrical theorist Wal Thornhill and his colleagues have repeatedly predicted that the required water levels in the nucleus will not be found. (See summaries here and here;. facts already in hand virtually preclude abundant ices on the nuclei of most comets.)
But when astronomers view the comas of comets spectroscopically, their own preconceptions deceive them. They are not seeing water. (If it were there, it would not be visible). What they actually see is the hydroxyl radical (OH), which they assume to be a residue of water (H2O) as it is broken down by the ultraviolet light of the Sun. This assumption is not only unwarranted, it requires a speed of "processing" by solar radiation beyond anything that can be demonstrated experimentally.
The explanation for the OH in cometary comas will be found in the energetic exchange between the electrically charged comet and the oppositely charged solar wind. The point was stated in an earlier Picture of the Day: "In the electric model, negative oxygen ions will be accelerated away from the comet in energetic jets, then combine preferentially with protons from the solar wind to form the observed OH radical and the neutral hydrogen gathered around the coma in vast concentric bubbles. The reactions simply confirm the energetic charge exchange between the nucleus and Sun."
The fragmentation of comet nuclei provides a telling opportunity to see if the ices that standard theory expects are actually there. But the time to look is in the early stages of an explosive outburst, before charge exchange with the Sun deceives astronomers. The electric model would anticipate that, with each outburst, observatories may record a decline in the relative abundance of water, before they report an increase in water (their interpretation, due to the presence of OH). As recent missions to comets have shown, water is consistently missing from the nuclei of comets but supposedly present in the comas. If the OH is, in fact, being manufactured through reactions with the solar wind, the contradictions are resolved.
Due to the electric force acting on the comet fragments their behavior should be carefully observed for gravity-defying accelerations. Factors that need to be taken into account include the speed of separation as new fragments move apart, and the collective gathering of these masses in the general direction of the tail—all in blatant disregard for the rules of gravity.
Here is the "explanation" given on the Hubble site:
"Sequential Hubble images of the B fragment, taken a few days apart, suggest that the chunks are pushed down the tail by outgassing from the icy, sunward-facing surfaces of the chunks, much like space-walking astronauts are propelled by their jetpacks. The smaller chunks have the lowest mass, and so are accelerated away from the parent nucleus faster than the larger chunks. Some of the chunks seem to dissipate completely over the course of several days".
But there is no factual basis for comparing a comet's "jets" to the "jetpacks" of astronauts. In fact, the Hubble statement suggests an obvious experiment that would quickly disabuse astronomers of their notions about cometary jets. Future astronauts should toss some chunks of ice out the door of the space shuttle and see if "jets" created by warming from the Sun move them away from the Sun!
The supersonic velocities of the comet's jets have nothing to do with the expelling of gases from imagined internal chambers. We've now visited enough comets to see that the supposed jet chambers do not exist. All of the evidence suggests that material is being excavated electrically, then accelerated into space. In fact, the presence of such energetic jets came as a great surprise to astronomers only because they had never considered the possibility that a comet is a charged body moving through the electric field of the Sun.
As noted above, if the explanation given on the Hubble site were correct, we should see the fragments at their brightest as they leave the nucleus. But we don't see them until they are a great distance away from their source. In electrical terms the smaller fragments will naturally accelerate faster because the electric force will be the same on each fragment, regardless of its mass.
It might also be worth looking for a relationship between solar outbursts and flaring of fragments. The electrical model would expect some occurrence of simultaneous outbursts of separated fragments. The old school would have a hard time explaining that.
Since we have identified the mechanism of comet disintegration as that of an exploding capacitor, the stresses to the mechanisms operating in earthquakes. In our Picture of the Day, "Sunspots and Earthquakes" we noted: "All that is required to trigger the comet fragmentation is an electrical breakdown within the comet. In this sense, it may be analogous to the electrical breakdown evident in an earthquake. And that breakdown in the comet may happen with any sudden change in the solar plasma environment. The more sudden the change in the comet's electrical environment, the more likely that flaring and fragmentation will occur
My observations on comets would be that they are not dirty snowballs; that the tail is an "accretion" to a "charged" entity called a comet and that the fragmentation of a comet with no tail on smaller fragments due to no "charge".
The struggle is away from God.
this is getting really interesting!
V,
Well, the main danger re: CIA current news is that his will be right in line with the move Rumsfeld has been working all along...To have all our intel services under the thumb of the military. This is the equivalent of getting all your news from just one source. And that source would be entirely self-serving. I think that this is the message that so many CIA 'leakers' have been trying to tell us...the 'crooks' are in charge and it's only getting worse.
For all the faults and crimes of the CIA, this can only take us closer to Orwell's 1984.
Technician,
WHAT'S interesting?
That's IT, Sword?
All this 'mystery' for something so many others have already told us? With greater detail and clarity?
And now it's Mr. Hoagland that holds the keys to our survival? Much respect to Richard, but puh-leeeeeeez, that's almost....anticlimatic!?!
I am no yellow-bellied bastard. I may be a bastard, but I'm not a coward. Because I call you to remove the 'Rummy Mumble Rocks' from your 'mouth' and simultaneously spit out the 'disclosure' you've claimed to have, is not the act of a coward. Just someone who tires of the games played here and the 3Ds. Again, I don't mind the games so much as the fact that others just don't feel justified in calling your claims to question, no doubt for other noble reasons, so others may feel you actually know something.
I think the answer is "No"!
Sword said:
Anything else MUST come from the so called "Captain"...
You want photographic evidence - he's got it...
You want verifiable evidence - he's got it...
----------------------
How come YOU don't have it, and WHO gave it to RCH?
Cool down, Sword. Have a smoke. All we want are ANSWERS. That's all.
-------------
Hello to Technician. Looks like we're going global again.
Sword:
THEY where right - I never should have aligned with a civillian - I never should have even said a word to you people. But, he got sent to me, by NASA, beacuse he was askign just to many questions, maybe they hoped I would shoot him... In any event, I'm tired of the games to. They should have sent me an astronuat...
Robert:
Not all 'civilians' are the same. Stanton Friedman, Dr. Stephen Greer, Grant Cameroon, Stephen Bassett, Dr. Bruce MacAbee, and many others including Dr. Mark Carlotto, Dr. John Brandenburg, Keith Laney and also many others in THAT arena of 'Disclosure'. If they were SERIOUS about 'Disclosure' they might have sent one of these rather than Richard. Maybe they were hoping you would shoot them, or...knowing you're proclivity for 'mudiness and innuendo' rather than USEFULL FACTS and ACTUAL EVIDENCE they knew he might be more persuaded by such than the folks I have mentioned above. As for an astronaut, you can reach Dr. Edward Mitchell yourself. He's already ON THE RECORD about Flying Saucers in space and on the Moon. Why hasn't HE been made 'mainstream media'???
And I, along with many others, am 'tired of the games' too.
Sword:
WHAT A WASTE OF MY *&^*( TIME! I seriously have better things to do than try and sheaperd lambs out of harms way.
Robert:
You're right. Finger glapping here in blogs, BBS formats of countless threads n posts isn't going to bring a Flying Saucer to my door. Others are doing work with real material and evidence just not getting mainstream review:
http://www.earthfiles.com/
So...FUCK IT...until I get something in the mail or I see you on CNN then all the rest is just finger flappin in the electronic ether.
At least I hosted a 'Disclosure' event with Stanton Friedman and GOT 'mainstream media' coverage of the event in my entire Television and newspaper area locally, I put my ass on the line filing an embarrassing FOIA against NASA about SPECIFICALLY section 1206.300 of their by-laws and was fired by the NYS Regeants Board.
I took a stand. I ACTED in the OPEN.
I am already in THE LIGHT and do not fear death or the final time when these questions are asked and answers MUST be given:
Who are you? What do you want?
When your heart is stopped and breath is caught.
Why are you here? Where have you been?
Where are you going? What will happen then?
These words written for the talent show
Contain more wisdom than first known
And as a seed with nourishment will grow
Your soul will realize it's never been alone
For in those moments when you're at the in-between
Where anywhen is really everywhere to be seen
Do you hear angels sing or your demons scream
Was life a nightmare or a continuing comforting dream
Who are you what do you want
When your heart is stopped and breath is caught
Why are you here where have you been
Where are you going what will happen then
Like the wraiths of Martian wind devils across Cydonia Mensae
The Martian Face staring at the stars still has many things to say
We are electromagnetic patterns that are created n shaped in many ways
Only Creation determines what cannot be and also what may
You are really only who you are
Look around you there you are
Behind the eyes in the mirror is who you are
Sparks across the holes of mind is the Ego you are
Who are you? What do you want?
When your heart is stopped and breath is caught.
Why are you here? Where have you been?
Where are you going? What will happen then?
Rhw 3-9-2000
Until I meet the Universe/Creator anything that comes only from finger flapping across a keyboard is just empty bytes that will leave me forever hungry no matter how many bytes are shoved my way. And the bad bytes are easily discerned from their flavor, the same way I know mainstream bullshit when I see and hear it.
And to Quote Jefferson Starship"
Have a nice life...MAYBE I'll see you "on the other side of this life."
Bob...
Cheers Bob.
Robert,
It is an honor to have you post with us.
Thank you.
Good stuff Robert really..
Sword ..you're doing the right thing. RCH has to do what a man has to do, but in his own time.
It took me six months of posting here before I finally disclosed my pic of a UFO. I sent it to Zebheowee??(sp)) and he cleaned up the image (which I have not posted.) I am reminded of the dream I had which I also posted of a bug on a window that morphed into a mini dragon in my hand and flew off as a multistage rocket. Just a dream right?
Sword, your last statements fit in well in the arena of Psy_Op in that they can be easily twisted to fulfill whatever your needs are at the time and/or used as "proof" or an escape (e.g. the Deflection of your not having anything to disclose is now blamed on Richard Hoagland!)
Sword, I do not take great pleasure in doing this. I have no desire to be cruel to you. Ya know, it's one thing to have one's eyes open, to have the knowledge and understanding and experience that makes us able to connect the dots and see beyond the bullshit, whether individually or as a group...but at some point, the skill of the skeptic must be employed, the alignment of the compass checked, the true of the square verified (hehe...love these Masonic references?). We just cannot believe EVERYTHING without some verification, without some questioning. We question Rumsfeld! We question NASA! Should we not also question You, tho friend you seem and claim to be?
The door remains open to you. I am not asking you to walk the plank. If there is nothing you can tell us openly at this time, then so mote it be...but then quit referring to 'it' and simply be one of the Crewe.
Sword,
Look, first off...PR??? Why the hell do you need PR? If bread crumbs is your idea of Public relaitions and getting the message out, perhaps you need to drop a resume off at Wonder Bread as opposed to here. WE can't handle the truth? We can't be sure that what you, Richard, or anyone else is telling the truth because we don't have any PROOF. Blind faith alone ain't gonna cut it SWORD. ask yourself, WHY should they beieve me? Why should we believe ANYTHING? At best, what i believe in is that I don't have the full picture much less a full loaf of bread.
Second of all, if RCH is the bad guy why aren't you harranging him on his turf as opposed to here?
What the hell are we supposed to do?
Part of the reason that this disclosure isn't being met with some kind of shock and awe, is that it isn't entirely NEW. The whole planet is going to wipe us out in 2012 is old news.
Are you right about it? I don't know. If you are, do you suggest I go out and run up all my credit cards and live like its not gonna be 2013? And if I do, and IT doesn't happen, will you take personal responsibility for my debts because you were ,oops sorry guys, wrong? Can you put your money where your moth is?
C2C has a very interesting photo of a "tunnel" in the clouds.
tunnel in the sky
Bob,
Well said, thank you.
SWORD,
Your disclosure over time has been informative. While it in many ways is simply validating Sitchen and others' previously released info, you have also shared some additional views on the coming calamity.
Problem is, your method has been stilted and at times Single Word Cryptic, amounting for many to be little breadcrumbs that are difficult to follow or check, because of their fragmented delivery with no extra context.
I suspect you are being minded and have, perhaps limitation, in your freedom to just, outright summarizing the whole scenario. If its meant to be a slight challenge for the likes of us, to 'decode', then I would say surely we are not the only ones who are "meant" to 'GET' this?
Strip it right down: There is imminent danger, meteor, approx 6 years soon near, technology exists to interceed, not perfect it seems, trouble in short term, move away from the coasts, precursor event to lead up to bigger moment in 2012.
What else? Dust masks? Winter ware? get a boat? grab your ankles, what value is this knowledge, IF legit?
It would seem we aren't on the "saving chosen ones' list", so perhaps ignorance for the many is bliss, because this preknowledge is simply heavy, and leaves me to wonder, what next then?
So we know now, if true, what do you want to see from your effort?Perhaps us running around telling everybody without a shread of tangible authentic reference? Our friends and family will think we have all cracked and lost it!? Like Chicken Little and the Sky is Falling.
You must be given perameters to open your path of disclosure more, SWORD.
If time has run out and ericswan(re eric Julien) is accurate with the May 25th approx date as one of the potential 'precursors' of the bigger event in 2012, then you MUST 'articulate' what is of key value.
Lapetus is not here, HERE is what 'matters'.
Share this Love here and let loose the relevent info for us to make use of. Otherwise, all the tech talk is for nothing but brain food and distraction.
Ultra modern ships etc. are great I'm sure, but at the level of ordinary community, which is descriptive here by the various likes of us, we need basics to respond to, in regards to the 'actuality' of various and potentially numerous impacts.
Its great about Mars, truly, but we are not on the immigration list. Lapetus? so what, I offered thoughts earlier about orbiting ARKS, and was thought to be dancing in the clouds. Phoboes Cruitne Lapetus, trojans hollow artificial old, so what, are you gonna pick us up en route? Sorry, a little sarcastic here to show what little some of this knowledge will ultimately mean to most people. Should I step ouside and wave down a C-130 floating by or what. :) dial 555-1212 and ask for my buddy SWORD to pick me up?
What is actionable? For us? Othewise we are just suckers who get to know in advance the how of our likely demise. So what!?
I have not put my arse on the line in combat, but I have nearly died more than a few times, notably getting hit by a drunk driver and breaking my neck. So I have been well beyond this duality and the human limitation and understand my role here in the Present, more clearly. Knowledge and details ain't gonna wake us all UP or thaw atrophied old frozen Hearts.
Time to raise the bar a little.
Time is running out and many of us know it and yes feel it.
Lets get to the Constructive Instructive
I really don't think that RCH putting out part 7 is going to do anything more than scratch a collective itch that we have all had.
Who's to say he's gonna put out what you think he will.
Will the anti grav guys even let him at this point?
Once article 7 "Moon with a view" is posted (the REAL one Rich - not the sanitized version) - YOU guys will have all the disclosure you need...
Sword
Sword,
What would be disclosed in "Moon With a View", Part 7 ?
Sword said:
FACT - Rich, with the help of some freinds, abondons the blog and sends his messengers to create another one - why? To keep me talking why he waits behind the curtain. (What a COWARD) (Theres alot of folk here who know what I mean)
...and....
You guys ask me for truth? I'm asking the one person who can provide it - TO DO SO.
Once article 7 "Moon with a view" is posted (the REAL one Rich - not the sanitized version) - YOU guys will have all the disclosure you need...
----------------
Sword, just explain this please:
Who decided to shift to Drydock? IIRC, it was a COLLECTIVE decision. Are you saying WE asked that you keep us fed on breadcrumbs till RCH comes back like the Second-Coming?
Why are you "talking" to RCH as though he is reading this blog? TEM has a Conference Room, which Bubba says is going full steam ahead. I'm very sure, he isnt going to make a Second-Coming on THIS Blog. It will KILL the Conference Room!
Article 7...Bohemia has already informed us that the Iapetus data is SEALED in NASA. And he's fighting to get it back. If that is RCH's source of info, then there's no more flour for breadcrumbs to feed us poor sodden bastards. What additonal data do YOU know about Iapetus, that Bohemia doesnt already know about?
starshipconstellation said...
C2C has a very interesting photo of a "tunnel" in the clouds.
----------------
Just an act of God. Nothing to see here, move along now....
Iontruo2 You completely read my mind and I could not have said it any better myself.
Sword: I have found your blogs to be quite interesting and like the others respect you in general. Having said that, I think FSHOD is not just about disclosing the truth, but also trying to survive what the truth entails assuming that its even possible. Even that depends on which truth we're looking at. 2012? The 10th,11th,12th Planet, the approaching comet? How can you help us in a practical way survive this knowing we don't have tickets about the next starship out of here?
Extrapolating a bit on what you're saying about RCH, he could well be in way over his head or someone has him by the family jewels. Or both. If Bohemia can't have access to his Iapetus data, I can't imagine RCH can get to it either to write a sanitised version of Chapter 7 let alone the unvarnished one.
RCH keeps saying the lie is different at every level which I have no doubt is true, but how good is he at knowing at each level what is a lie and what is the truth? I worry about that for my own ability to separate wheat from chaff?
At what point are all of us being played as pawns in a bigger game?
respectfully,
starshipconstellation
SWORD,
My post to you was purely in SYNC, because I hadn't read your flaming rant moment there yet.
In the midst of this place with so many bullshitters trying to stear the topics, and you have read their worst recently, common you can understand the desire here for HONEST, OPEN, DISCLOSURE.
Sadly Hoagland had bailed, and now we are simply a gathering of sincere people who decided to persist without Richard. What else was there to do? So many other paths of reasonable enquiry we could surf together, we could hardly continue to have any regard for RCH considering he was 'utterly gone'.
Your line here SWORD: FACT - Rich, with the help of some freinds, abondons the blog and sends his messengers to create another one - why? To keep me talking while) he waits behind the curtain. (What a COWARD) (Theres alot of folk here who know what I mean)
IonTruO2--See! The game is afoot and the cryptic side speak is growing tedious. I did not come here to be condescended to, or be played in some secondary group dynamic with the knowitalls, and the rest of us as some adience of guinee pigs fumbling through a bunch of cryptic trickle from You, RCH or anyone for that matter. Please just be straight.
So, right RCH off, cus he ain't here and we don't care what his schtick is anymore.
Lets continue on with our dialogue along lines of thought and disclosure that are more fulfillable.
Starship said
"How can you help us in a practical way survive this knowing we don't have tickets about the next starship out of here?"
Exactly. Its like telling us that the buliding is on fire but hiding all the exits. Hardly fair now is it SWORD?
...
I am sure you have accounted for this next step...waht do your superiors say to do now? Let us ROT? Typical.
starshipconstellation,
tks brother,
all hail the synchronicity!
scaletm,
Keep on, good posts!
And also SWORD, with all due respect you comment:
"Rich, with the help of some freinds, abondons the blog and sends his messengers to create another one - why? To keep me talking while) he waits behind the curtain. (What a COWARD) (Theres alot of folk here who know what I mean)"
Means what exactly? that he re-stared up his "pay for info" confrence room, or what we did by creating FSHOD? I was one of the ones who pushed for a move from TEM once it became galaringly apparent that Richard had flown the coop, and i can promise you I am in no way affiliated with RCH other than what little conversing I did with him at TEM. Please clarify this because it reads, to me, as though SK and crewe were somehow "told" to continue on with the dialogue. We chose to do so because we happen to like each other. ( You might not know that as of late, but we do none the less)
To the best of my knowlege, please correct me if i am wrong, FSHOD is unique in its ability to continue with a dialogue that expands on what most BLOGS keep in narrow focus. this blog is wholly unique in that,while we have lost a few kindered spirits along the way, we pretty much have reamied in tact and still keep on keepin on. I really don't care if its just us or one million that read it, we all have contributed to keeping the talk ALIVE. And you, dear SWORD, are a very important person within that talk. You,SWORD, have at times maintained a bit of a cult status by your ability to keep us guessing...
Now that we don't have to guess become the anti hero here and tell us the HOW of the WHY. Don't self destruct just when you are needed the most.
Has anybody seen this Flight 93? Just wondering what level of Psy_Op THIS is? Wonder who Funded and thought this thing up? hmmm...hate to spend the money...have to wait for DVD...Where's the damn Chinese pirates when ya need 'em? :)
Just for the record, anyone interested in the genesis of this blog should take the link on the main FSHOD page to 'Drydock' blog and read the first post. What you see is what you GOT! While I was an avid fan of Richard Hoagland and TEM, I am certainly NOT his "messenger" in any way, shape or form. I was merely one of the Crew who say a need, saw nobody doing anything about it, determined that I could do the technical things to make drydock 'look like home', LEARNED some HTML and made it happen.
I have NEVER had any communication with RCH except for the few times he responded to me on his blog. I faxed, emailed and even emailed Mike Bara who said he'd pass along my message....never a peep from RCH. So there ya go...nuthin' more, nuthin' less.
I didn't do this for money or glory. My sole goal was to become MASTER OF THE UNIVEEEEEEEEEEEERSE!!!!!
I agree wholeheartedly with Scarlet's last two sentences. Well said, friend.
where going to hi-jack that starship and get so REALLY good photos of THIS MOST IMPORTANT area:
http://www.enterprisemission.com/images_v2/Iapetus2/Deathstar-20-l.jpg
-------------
Sword, Iapetus cant be a floating seed-bank/ark if the Aluminium-26 is native to that moon. Al-26 has a half-life of only 720,000 years. If it is native, then Iapetus must be very young, and RCH's ark hypothesis is not valid.
If you spin fast enough one hand clapping probably equals that tree in the forest. The same principle must apply when you centrifuge uranium 235
http://www.surveillanceissues.com/
I didn't do this for money or glory. My sole goal was to become MASTER OF THE UNIVEEEEEEEEEEEERSE!!!!!
ROFL
SUNKING IS OUR LEADER SUNKING IS OUR LEADER SUNKING IS OUR LEADER baaa SUNKING IS OUR LEADER SUNKING IS OUR baaa LEADER
LMAO!
:-)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1921276117304287501&q=Bridges+bush
Bush vs Bush.
And I thought I'd seen ALL the wierdness !
PLEASE watch this till at least half-way through ("Nuclear Proliferation, Nuclear Proliferation...").
Yeh Gads...where's Jas ? If he could be the THIRD person on that forum ?
Is Bridges getting one up on Bush ? (I can hear Bush's PR advisor now...."would'nt it be
a great idea if we did a humour scit...blah...blah").
Not ALL the audience were laughing.
And why did I keep getting a mental image of a shell leaping out of some killing
machine gun every time there was a laugh ?
This is wierd central.
DJBarney
Updated pix of UFO?
http://hakkors.blogspot.com/
My sole goal was to become MASTER OF THE UNIVEEEEEEEEEEEERSE!!!!!
<
Duh, it was obvious to me the moment I saw that purple master uniform.
peak oil..the untold story.
http://www.hubbertpeak.com/laherrere/OilShaleReview200509.pdf
ROFL @ Uni!
na zdrowie,
That was pretty interesting. Who woulda thunk it? Certainly make some more good news stories if true.
sword said;
I already threw out all my aces - and all the face cars.
You still don't understand what I am discloseing?
Have you not been listening to anything I have said?
The planet of crossing is returning and - its on an intercept course - as fortold by many, to include Jesus.
WTF else do you need to know?
Anything else MUST come from the so called "Captain"...
You want photographic evidence - he's got it...
You want verifiable evidence - he's got it...
Hoagland's got the disclosure you want - and he's been hideing it from EVERYONE.
Yellow bellied bastard - DO YOUR FUCKING JOB!
Sword
Monday, May 08, 2006 12:19:22 PM
I know Nibiru is coming back. It has to. As for RCH and him having the rest of what we need to know, did he get stopped from disclosing? With respect to part 7, if there is no new data until 2007 there is nothing to write, right? If both are not mutually exclusive, and he was not stopped from disclosing, why is he not? What is his problem? Is he the only one that can disclose?
I know sword, more questions. Sorry bro. There is or are a few reasons why this has not happened. Why? I thought you were close to RCH or had met him about this stuff.
Robert,
You made my little post moot.
sword,
RCH was never my leader. He was a unique source of information. And yes, the blog was very cool and got the brain muscles working. You are the one saying RCH was "the Captain". PR madness, what's that all about?
No one that has ever spoken of disclosure (in this blog or on RCH's) has ever come right out and said something straight. It's always been coated with some sort of slick packaging designed to keep us all chomping at the bit for the next installment.
You are probably right, if disclosure ever happened we would probably not believe it because of all the disinfo and other bs we've had dropped on us since the 50's. So, your rant, while it probably contains truths, is just another shot of verbal dancing just like what we've always had to contend with. Anyone claiming they are disclosing something should, "Say what they mean, and mean what they say" (Thanks Robert) This has all gone on long enough. Our ignorance is the product of your ops.
sword said;
"I don't think you guys truley understand - I was raised knowing this stuff - asking me for proof is sort of - well silly if you ask me. Silly you ask - yeah - silly. How can I possibly relate to you people. The stuff I talk about is realitivly common knowlege to me and my peers - my collective group of soliders and there families. We where all raised knowing this stuff to be true - with the truth all around us. It's almost like I speak a diffrent launguge. It's like im from a completly diffrent culture - which I find so very very odd.
Trying to talk to you guys is frustrating. I dont provide the truth beacuse I don't feel as I need to as I already KNOW it to be true...
I assume you guys know as much as me already, but then again you wheren't raised with the truth towering over you... he he he."
sword,
Help us to make it our common knowledge, share your knowledge. We may already know true, but by taking away the doubt and sharing the news would put us all on the same page. Would we not be more reliable in our understanding of each other?
sword said;
Sword:
Nothing is going to stop him at this point from posting Article 7 (The one with Sword disclosure)
You know, if you guys sit back and think for a bit - your going to realize what this is supposed to be all about. I can't spill beans unless RICH helps me out. At this point - its needed - he needs to post that fucking article so EVERYONE can move on.
The whole point ot giving Rich this info is so that he could have spilled the beans about us - and then - hey ho - I come along and say - yeah - here we are and here is what we got planned. Answer a few questions and then get back to the matters at hand. The public - even a small section - gets the real scoop. Over time, more and more things happen - oh! look! its Sword in aciton...! And everyone become aquinted with the facts of whats really going on.
Over time, disclosure spreads, evryone gets informed and in the interium of the comet showing itself before it goes back behind the sun - HOPEFULLY we can stave of some panic. So, I have been quietly doing what Rich was supposed to do, spill the beans. But, I am not a celebrity - nor should I EVER be - so no one listens - im just another black and white character in the sea of the same.
Think about it folks. WHY!
Why! WHY!
Why do all this?
Whats going to happen over time? Richs site WAS getting hammered with hits - hell this site is proably geting many more as well. The more this info spreads (which is what you guys want) THE MORE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO PANIC - its just a FACT - an UNCONTROLABLE FACT! So, in an effort to educate and stop mass choas before it starts - this little experiment was conceived just prior to Rich's arrival. NASA was going to send me a voice, somebody we could use as PR to spread the TRUTH.
So I end up with Richard C. Hoagland.
We had been hopeing for somebody else - but alas - NASA says he's their man. He's the guy THEY want to use to spread the news. I proably could have done better with ANYONE else besides Rich. Bob Barker would have done me better at this point.
So, everything goes as planned - the trip to Alaska by Rich was interesting and unplanned - but regardless Articles 1-6 went by nicely - then - nothing. It was increadibly anti-climatic. It was inreadably depressing. We waited and wondered if he was going to do his bit. Apprently not, so the order was given to start doing it anyway - - by me... I'm not cut out for this.
I'm not a PR person. (If you guys havn't figured that out by now)
I'm the commander of some increadbly brave men and women - I am responsible for there and there children welfare - the security of the base(s) and on top of all this shit - I'm stuck recoperating on another Military Base 3500 miles away from the materials I could produce to provide better disclosure. It wasn't supposed to be like this. It wasn't supposed to go like this. (Maybe this is why they wanted me recoperating this far away - the fear I might overstep my bounds... like posting an image from shuttle to shuttle of a pressed ham in the window - I miss you guys! Mama mama PLEASE Send me off to the infantry! I remeber!)
A complete DVD should be in the hands of my detractors within days or hours. The federal goverment should do a quick job of moving a dvd from one box to another (...funny how mail gets droped less than a couple hundred feet from an address - it goes on a fun trip before it gets delivered) (Who's going to get it - now theres a mystery - whos going to win the lottery of knowlege this week?) Chances are, it will get posted, I will get arrested and thrown back in the brig, Rich will stay hidden, and no one will belive me yet.
I have done everything in my power to get him to come out of hideing (and ya know - he might have soem interesting stories about that) - I have even called the gentleman a COWARD. I have droped EVERY SINGLE message, every hint, every obscure detail (that only he would know)...
What do I have to do now? Take off my helmet and glove and slap him across the face? Challange him to Scaler Pistols at 1.17 AU?
Now, I must say, he didn't do to bad for himself in the ritualistic fight of acceptance - he gained respect from my soiders that day. Now he's losing it...
I have sent every MESSAGE he needs - whats the wait - whats the delay?
Sorry if I seem a little crass - a little beligerent - and a little pist. I am, after all, a pirate. It is frustrating - and I am NOT trained to be a PR person. On top of everything else - the "plan" is FIVE years behind, everything public NASA is doing NOW should have been happening five years ago, this includes bio fuel (which was "discovered" in 1903/06) except the CASSINI misison which was RIGHT ON SCHEDULE
BTW - This is a MESSAGE for those who are in the KNOW - where is Cassini right now? And DONT TELL ME that this is it:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/operations/images/cassini_today4.jpg
Disclousure? Where going to get some very close pictures of that giant shem - right god dammed now... Sword a liar huh? A captain knows that we can do this - and beacuse I am frustrated with him for not doing his job - and beacuse we are pist at NASA for sending us this goob - where going to hi-jack that starship and get so REALLY good photos of THIS MOST IMPORTANT area:
http://www.enterprisemission.com/images_v2/Iapetus2/Deathstar-20-l.jpg
Sword
Monday, May 08, 2006 3:58:44 PM
Damn dude, you laid out some shit there. For the first time, I really heard you.
sunking said;
I didn't do this for money or glory. My sole goal was to become MASTER OF THE UNIVEEEEEEEEEEEERSE!!!!!
Monday, May 08, 2006 4:23:57 PM
Man, I always Knew you had ulterior motive with this blog! ;) LOL!
osotp said;
Sword, Iapetus cant be a floating seed-bank/ark if the Aluminium-26 is native to that moon. Al-26 has a half-life of only 720,000 years. If it is native, then Iapetus must be very young, and RCH's ark hypothesis is not valid.
Monday, May 08, 2006 4:34:18 PM
osotp,
What if it is a vehicle of the Annunaki? They only got here 432,000 years ago. That would still make RCH's theory possible to some degree. Eh?
Wayne
I gotta assume that "We want disclosure" means 'we want it for the rest of the world that has no clue'
I say this because we at FSHOD are among those that pretty much already know what is hidden and undisclosed.
'Free' energy, shems, stuff on Mars, Iapetus, 9-11 scam, peak oil, secret space program, and maybe a bad day this month or in 2012.
What else dont we know about ? I like the part that says they dont want us to know how powerful we really are. There are more of us than them. What are the numbers anyhow? How many of them are there?
Thats a good point Uni.
What else don't we know about???sheesh. Like all of the above don't keep me up at night ;)
Post a Comment
<< Home